UDC: 
DOI: 
10.22389/0016-7126-2018-933-3-35-45
1 Kharchenko S.V.
2 Kazakov S.G.
Year: 
№: 
933
Pages: 
35-45

Lomonosov Moscow State University (MSU)

1, 

Kursk State University

2, 
Abstract:
The article gives a part of an experiment on determining the most common errors in the digitization of objects of different topological types, namely considering errors in the setting of points. The experiment was performed in 2015–2017 on the basis of the Kursk State University, the number of participants was 63 people. Each of them digitized 30 points in four scales of the display (that is, 120 points from a subject). Then the directions and absolute values of the errors were determined. According to these initial data it was established that the widespread model of errors in the setting of points, defined by two-dimensional normal distribution, in many cases does not correspond to reality (was not observed with more than half of the subjects). The hypothesis of the equability of error directions was proved even to a lesser degree, since the majority had its own characteristic direction of error (most often this was displacement of the position of the point from the true to the southeast, least of all to the northwest). 45 out of 63 subjects demonstrated an uneven distribution of directions of setting points around the true position. The absolute value of the allowed errors in meters is proportional to the scale of the display, but is unchanged in pixels of the screen. The median error is approximately 1 pix, the 99th quantile of the distribution of error values corresponds to 4,1 pix. The results of the experiment make it possible to choose in advance the optimum scale of the digitization of the raster (not too large and not too shallow) in order to achieve the required quality of vectorization.
The study was carried out with the fi nancial support of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research for the project 17-05-00765 a.
References: 
1.   Volkov N. M. Principy i metody kartometrii. Moscow: Izd-vo AN SSSR, 1950, 326 p.
2.   DeMers M. N. Geografi cheskie informacionnye sistemy. Osnovy. Moscow: Data+, 1999, 478 p.
3.   Amrhein C. G., Griffith D. A. (1991) A model for statistical quality control of spatial data in a GIS. Proceedings, GIS 91, Canadian Conference. pp. 91–103.
4.   Bolstad P. V., Gessler P., Lillesand T. M. (1990) Positional uncertainty in manually digitized map data. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, Volume 4, no. 4, pp. 399–412. DOI: 10.1080/02693799008941555.
5.   Dunn R., Harrison A. R., White J. C. (1990) Positional accuracy and measurement error in digital databases of land use: an empirical study. International Journal of Geographical Information System, Volume 4, no. 4, pp. 385–398.
6.   Dutton G. (1992) Handling positional uncertainty in spatial databases. Proceedings of 5th International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling. pp. 460–469.
7.   Gong P., Zheng X., Chen J. (1995) Boundary uncertainties in digitized maps: an experiment on digitization errors Geographic Information Sciences. A Journal of the Association of Chinese Professionals in Geographic Information Systems, Volume 1, no. 2, pp. 65–72. DOI: 10.1080/10824009509480472.
8.   Ho W. H., Chang K. T. (1997) Accuracy assessment of digitized data with randomized block model. Journal of surveying engineering, Volume 123, no. 3, pp. 87–100.
9.   Jammalamadaka S. R., SenGupta A. (2001) Topics in circular statistics. World Scientific, Singapore, 336 p.
10.   Royston P. (1982) An extension of Shapiro and Wilk’s W test for normality to large samples. Applied Statistics, 31. pp. 115-124.
11.   Taylor P. J. (1977) Quantitative methods on geography. An introduction to spatial analysis. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, 386 p.
12.   Wu H. S., Liu Z. L. (2008) Simulation and model validation of positional uncertainty of line feature on manual digitizing a map. The international archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences, no. 37, pp. 3–11.
Citation:
Kharchenko S.V., 
Kazakov S.G., 
(2018) The experiment on assessment of point position accuracy at the manual digitizing of a raster map. Geodesy and cartography = Geodezia i Kartografia, 79(3), pp. 35-45. (In Russian). DOI: 10.22389/0016-7126-2018-933-3-35-45
Publication History
Received: 30.11.2017
Accepted: 30.01.2018
Published: 20.03.2018

Content

2018 March DOI:
10.22389/0016-7126-2018-933-3