UDC: 
DOI: 
10.22389/0016-7126-2021-970-4-18-23
1 Bogdanov V.N.
2 Dugarova G.B.
Year: 
№: 
970
Pages: 
18-23

Sochava Institute of Geography SB RAS

1, 
2, 
Abstract:
The research is devoted to the process of suburbanization on the example the Irkutsk city agglomeration. The suburbanization is one of the stages of agglomeration development. Mapping and geoinformation methods are particularly important in the our study. They provide extensive opportunities for complex operational mapping and analysis of the suburbanization, in determining its current boundaries and development directions in the Irkutsk agglomeration. We have created a series of maps showing various aspects of the study area (population change, transport accessibility, development dynamics of buildings, air pollution, soil contamination, maps of accessibility of socio-economic infrastructure, etc.). Many of them are not presented in the article due to limited volume. As a result of the study, the specifics of the development of the Irkutsk suburb were noted and the main factors of its development were determined. Transport accessibility is one of the main factors in the formation of a network of suburban settlements. This research has a great scientific and practical significance for science and management structures.
The reported study was funded by RFBR and MECSS, project number № 20-55-44023 Mong_a.
References: 
1.   Atlas razvitiya Irkutska. Irkutsk: Izd-vo Instituta geografi i im. V. B. Sochavy SO RAN, 2011, 131 p.
2.   Breslavskii A. S. Kakoi mozhet byt' rossiiskaya suburbanizatsiya?. Mir Rossii. Sotsiologiya. Etnologiya, 2016, no. 1, pp. 79–102.
3.   Bogdanov V. N. Geoinformatsionnoe kartografirovanie gorodskoi sredy. Novosibirsk: Izd-vo Sibirskogo otd-niya Rossiiskoi akad. Nauk, 2006, 184 p.
4.   Vorobiev A.N. (2014) The mapping of density of population using people habitat (on the sample of Irkutsk district). Geodezia i Kartografia, (9), pp. 29-33. (In Russian). DOI: 10.22389/0016-7126-2014-891-9-29-33.
5.   Grigorichev K. V. Transformatsiya ekonomicheskogo polya prigoroda Irkutska. Idei i idealy, 2013, Vol. 1, no. 4 (18), pp. 51–61.
6.   Grigorichev K. V. Mnogoobrazie prigoroda: suburbanizatsiya v sibirskom regione (sluchai Irkutska). Gorodskie issledovaniya i praktiki, 2016, Vol. 1, no. 2 (3), pp. 7–23.
7.   Fava S. F. (1956) Suburbanism as a Way of Life. American Sociological Review, Volume 21, no. 1, pp. 34-37.
8.   Fishman R. (1994) Urbanity and Suburbanity: Rethinking the Burbs. American Quarterly, Volume 46, no. 1, pp. 35-39.
9.   Kladivo P., Roubínek P., Opravil Z., Nesvadbová M. (2015) Suburbanization and local governance - positive and negative forms: Olomouc case study. Szymańska, K. Rogatka (eds).Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series. D, Volume 27, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Toruń, pp. 95-107.
10.   Krisjane Z., Berzins M. (2012) Post-socialist urban trends: new patterns and motivations for migration in the suburban areas of Rīga, Latvia. Urban studies, no. 2 (49), pp. 289-306.
11.   Klaassen L., Scimemi G. (1981) Theoretical issuers in urban dynamics. Dynamics of Urban Development. St. MartinТs Pres, New York, pp. 8-28.
12.   Mikelbank B. (2004) A typology of U.S. suburban places. Housing Policy Debate, Volume 15, no. 4, pp. 935-964.
13.   Smigiel C., Brade I. (2011) Suburbanisierung im östlichen Europa im Zeitalter neoliberaler Stadtentwicklung. The Planning Review, no. 2, pp. 27-43.
14.   Schmidt S., Fina S., Siedentop S. (2015) Post-socialist Sprawl: A Cross-Country Comparison. European Planning Studies, Volume 23, no. 7, pp. 1357-1380.
Citation:
Bogdanov V.N., 
Dugarova G.B., 
(2021) Geoinformation mapping of the Irkutsk city suburbanization. Geodesy and cartography = Geodezia i Kartografia, 82(4), pp. 18-23. (In Russian). DOI: 10.22389/0016-7126-2021-970-4-18-23
Publication History
Received: 04.08.2020
Accepted: 28.12.2020
Published: 20.05.2021

Content

2021 April DOI:
10.22389/0016-7126-2021-970-4