DOI: 
10.22389/0016-7126-2024-1003-1-43-51
1 Romanchikov A.Yu.
2 Baltyzhakova T.I.
3 Belyaev V.V.
Year: 
№: 
1003
Pages: 
43-51

Empress Catherine II Saint Petersburg Mining University

1, 
2, 
3, 
Abstract:
The authors propose a method for evaluating the public transport accessibility of a city, based on the spatial distribution of real estate and commercial property in its territory, it enables making a rating table of routes and stops. The relevance of the study is related to the high social importance of mass transit, since its accessibility creates a more comfortable urban environment and offers new opportunities to the residents. The significant growth of research on this topic is a result of the social need to improve the use of urban space. The rapid development in the field of big data processing makes it much more relevant to the real situation than any previous models. However, researchers often lack up-to-date information on the distribution of the population in a given territory, because the concept of state open spatial data in Russia is currently in its early stages, and city authorities may decide to make it confidential. The proposed quantitative approach to assessing the provision of urban areas with land transportation means is based on using spatial data available in open sources, as well as methods of geospatial analysis and modelling. It is used to study the public transport in St. Petersburg, RF; the technique has enabled identifying the main municipal routes as well as the parts of the city requiring network expansion
References: 
1.   Kiselev V. A., Tributs O. A. Raionirovanie munitsipal'nogo obrazovaniya po kompleksu pokazatelei blagoustroennosti. Zapiski Gornogo instituta, 2012, no. 196, pp. 68–73.
2.   Kozin E. G. Sovershenstvovanie organizatsionno-tekhnicheskikh reshenii po zakrepleniyu v khozyaistvennoe vedenie zakonchennykh stroitel'nykh ob"ektov metropolitena. Zapiski Gornogo instituta, 2017, no. 228, pp. 674–680. DOI: 10.25515/pmi.2017.6.674.
3.   Somov Eh.V. Geoinformacionnoe modelirovanie pri ocenke kachestva transportnogo obsluzhivaniya gorodskogo naseleniya (na primere Yugo-Zapada Moskvy). Vestn. Mosk. un-ta, Seriya 5. Geografiya, M.: Izd-vo MGU, 2013, no. 1, pp. 42-46.
4.   Somov Eh.V. Matematiko-kartograficheskoe modelirovanie dostupnosti centra goroda na obshchestvennom transporte pri ocenke transportnoj obespechennosti naseleniya g. Moskvy. Regional'nye issledovaniya, 2014, no. 1(43), pp. 68–74.
5.   Allen W. B., Liu D., Singer S. (1993) Accesibility measures of U.S. metropolitan areas. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, no. 27 (6), pp. 439–449. DOI: 10.1016/0191-2615(93)90016-4.
6.   Baltyzhakova T., Romanchikov A. (2021) Spatial analysis of subway passenger traffic in Saint Petersburg. Geodesy and Cartography, no. 47 (1), pp. 10–20. DOI: 10.3846/gac.2021.11980.
7.   Boisjoly G., El-Geneidy A. M. (2017) How to get there? A critical assessment of accessibility objectives and indicators in metropolitan transportation plans. Transport Policy, no. 55, pp. 38–50. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.12.011.
8.   Bykowa E., Gerasimova I. (2019) Land Plot Selection Rationale for the Location of Linear Facilities. Land, no. 8 (4), DOI: 10.3390/land8040067.
9.   Bykowa E., Skachkova M., Raguzin I., Dyachkova I., Boltov M. (2022) Automation of Negative Infrastructural Externalities Assessment Methods to Determine the Cost of Land Resources Based on the Development of a 'Thin Client' Model. Sustainability, no. 14 (15), DOI: 10.3390/su14159383.
10.   Kraft S. (2016) Measuring and modelling the spatial accessibility of public transport stops in GIS. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin, no. 65 (1), pp. 57–69. DOI: 10.15201/hungeobull.65.1.5.
11.   Miller E. J. (2018) Accessibility: measurement and application in transportation planning. Transport Reviews, no. 38 (5), pp. 551–555. DOI: 10.1080/01441647.2018.1492778.
12.   Morozov A. S., Kontsevik G. I., Shmeleva I. A., Schneider L., Zakharenko N., Budenny S., Mityagin S. A. (2023) Assessing the transport connectivity of urban territories, based on inter-modal transport accessibility. Frontiers in Built Environment, no. 9, pp. 1–14. DOI: 10.3389/fbuil.2023.1148708.
13.   Smith D. A., Shen Y., Barros J., Zhong C., Batty M., Giannotti M. (2020) A compact city for the wealthy? Employment accessibility inequalities between occupational classes in the London metropolitan region 2011. Journal of Transport Geography, Volume 86, no. 102767, DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102767.
14.   van den Berg J., Köbben B., van der Drift S., Wismans L. (2018) Towards a dynamic isochrone map: Adding spatiotemporal traffic and population data. In book: Progress in Location Based Services. pp. 195–209. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-71470-7_10.
Citation:
Romanchikov A.Yu., 
Baltyzhakova T.I., 
Belyaev V.V., 
(2024) Evaluation of public land transport accessibility in St. Petersburg, Russia, using a geospatial approach. Geodesy and cartography = Geodezia i Kartografia, 85(1), pp. 43-51. (In Russian). DOI: 10.22389/0016-7126-2024-1003-1-43-51
Publication History
Received: 11.05.2023
Accepted: 31.10.2023
Published: 25.02.2024

Content

2024 January DOI:
10.22389/0016-7126-2024-1003-1