ISSN 0016-7126 (Print)
ISSN 2587-8492 (Online)
UDC:
DOI:
10.22389/0016-7126-2026-1028-2-10-22
Abstract:
The author examines some theoretical and methodological foundations of cartographic supporting scientific and technical activities. It is considered as a systemic process aimed at understanding aspects of the surrounding reality and making research and economic-management decisions using digital cartographic and geoinformation products. Interrelations and differences between cartographic support, mapping, geoinformation and other types of modeling are presented. The systems approach assumes existing of internal components, whose interrelations implement cognitive and communicative aspects of supporting. Taking into account the domestic experience, a conceptual model of the system’s structure is proposed. Basic components are represented by the result, methods and concepts, data sources, technical means and personnel. Interrelations of the components determine implementing the said process, forming properties of its outcome and improving its internal parts. The fundamental role of the identified elements in development of its functions was empirically confirmed. The advantages of the new methodological principle of cartographic support are described in detail. The proposed conceptual model allows maintaining the demand for mapping methods and specialists in implementation of scientific and technical tasks in the era of digital transformation of the society
References:
| 1. Alekseenko N.A. (2019) Topical issues of cartographic supporting specially protected natural areas of Russia. Geodezia i Kartografia, 80(1), pp. 13-23. (In Russian). DOI: 10.22389/0016-7126-2019-943-1-13-23. |
| 2. Alekseenko N. A. Metodicheskie osobennosti kartograficheskogo obespecheniya prirodoohrannoi deyatel’nosti osobo ohranyaemyh prirodnyh territorii Rossii. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 5. Geografiya, 2014, no. 1, pp. 52-57. |
| 3. Aslanikashvili A. F. Metakartografiya. Osnovnyye problemy. Tbilisi: Metsniereba, 1974, 125 p. |
| 4. Vasil'ev I.V., Korobov A.V., Pobedinskij G.G. Strategicheskie napravleniya razvitiya topografo-geodezicheskogo i kartograficheskogo obespecheniya Rossijskoj Federacii. Vestn. SGUGiT, 2015, 2(30). pp. 5–23. |
| 5. Karpik A.P. Metodologicheskie i tekhnologicheskie osnovy geoinformacionnogo obespecheniya territorij. Novosibirsk: izd. SGGA, 2004, 260 p. |
| 6. Kureneva N. I., Gutarev S. V. Novye podkhody k formirovaniyu kartograficheskogo obespecheniya MChS Rossii. Tekhnologii grazhdanskoi bezopasnosti, 2013, Vol. 10, no. 1 (35), pp. 44–48. |
| 7. Levadnyi Yu. V., Chernov I. V., Osipov G. K. Kompleks geoinformatsionnogo obespecheniya. Informatsiya i kosmos, 2023, no. 1, pp. 120–125. |
| 8. Loginov D.S. (2023) 31st International Cartographic Conference. Geodezia i Kartografia, 84(9), pp. 52-63. (In Russian). DOI: 10.22389/0016-7126-2023-999-9-52-63. |
| 9. Loginov D. S. Sistematizatsiya rezul'tatov i podkhodov k ponimaniyu kartograficheskogo obespecheniya nauchno-proizvodstvennoi deyatel'nosti. Vestnik SSUGT, 2025, Vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 75–87. DOI: 10.33764/2411-1759-2025-30-4-75-87. |
| 10. Pobedinskii G. G. Sovremennye problemy pravovogo i tekhnicheskogo regulirovaniya geodezicheskoi i kartograficheskoi deyatel'nosti, sozdaniya i obnovleniya geoprostranstvennykh dannykh. Interekspo Geo-Sibir, Novosibirsk: SGUGiT, 2024, 8 Vol. 1, pp. 3–21. DOI: 10.33764/2618-981X-2024-1-3-21. |
| 11. Salishchev K.A. Kartografiya. – 3-e izd. pererab. i dop. M.: Vysshaya shkola, 1982, 271 p. |
| 12. Chernov I.V., Yakunin V.I. (2023) The process model of creating cartographic products for solving the task of a cartographic production system synthesis. Geodezia i Kartografia, 84(2), pp. 21-28. (In Russian). DOI: 10.22389/0016-7126-2023-992-2-21-28. |
| 13. Chibryakov Ya.Yu. (2019) On the term of “mapping”. Geodezia i Kartografia, 80(8), pp. 59-63. (In Russian). DOI: 10.22389/0016-7126-2019-950-8-59-63. |
| 14. Yankelevich S. S. Funktsii karty v usloviyakh postindustrial'noi epokhi. Vestnik SSUGT, 2020, Vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 160–168. DOI: 10.33764/2411-1759-2020-25-2-160-168. |
| 15. Cartwright W. (2012) Neocartography: opportunities, issues and prospects. South African Journal of Geomatics, no. 1 (1), pp. 14–31. |
| 16. Gartner G., Ignateva O., Zhunis B., Pühringer J. (2024) Conceptualizing and validating the trustworthiness of maps through an empirical study on the influence of cultural background on map design perception. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, no. 13 (2), DOI: 10.3390/ijgi13020039. |
| 17. Kitchin R., Dodge M. (2007) Rethinking maps. Progress in Human Geography, no. 31 (3), pp. 331–344. DOI: 10.1177/0309132507077082. |
| 18. Roth R. E., Ross K. S., MacEachren A. M. (2015) User-centered design for interactive maps: a case study in crime analysis. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, no. 4 (1), pp. 262–301. DOI: 10.3390/ijgi4010262. |
| 19. Tsou M. H., Mejia C. (2023) Beyond mapping: extend the role of cartographers to user interface designers in the Metaverse using virtual reality, augmented reality, and mixed reality. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, no. 51 (5), pp. 659–673. DOI: 10.1080/15230406.2023.2264748. |
Citation:
| (2026) Cartographic support as a process: conceptual model of system and its application. Geodesy and cartography = Geodeziya i Kartografiya, 87(2), pp. 10-22. (In Russian). DOI: 10.22389/0016-7126-2026-1028-2-10-22 |