The new methodics for computing of probability parameters of landslide occurance

Geodynamic research

UDC:

528.4:551.3

DOI:

10.22389/0016-7126-2016-911-5-31-33

1 Ganiyeva S.A.

2 Mehdiyev J.T.

Year:

2016

№:

911

Pages:

31-33

Azerbaijan University of Architecture and Construction

1,

2,

Abstract:

The classic approach for computation of landslide subjection of areas providing for calculation of logistic equation for all elementary subzones of studied area and further generalization of results of subzones is characterized with the big volume of calculations and required time period. In the article the new attitude for solution of the task is formulated which provide for non-direct, generalized estimation of said index for all subzones of studied area of transferred volume of particles due to landslide. To solve the problem the known model is used which relates mathematically the predicted volume of transferred particles and the area effected by landslide. Solution of tdeveloped system of equations in regard of computation coefficients upon known values of above parameters allows to develop the new methodics for determination of probability of occurance of lanslide at the studied area. The formulaes allowing to caslculate the value of studied index without determination of big number of components of logistic equationare presented.

Keywords:

probability, geomorphology, logistical equation, model, landslide, transfer

References:

1. Chung H.H. (2008) Terrain stability analysis using hydrologic model for predicting shallow landslides- a study on Piya Creek watershed. M. S. Thesis of Institute of Applied Geology, National Central University. Taiwan,

2. Chyi-TyiLee GIS Application in Landslide Hazard Analysis – An Example from the Shih men Reservoir Catchment Area in Northern Taiwan. URL: www.pnclink.org/pnc2008/english/full/06_Full_GISTech_1130.pdf.

3. Hovius N., Stark C., Allen P. (1997) Sediment flux from a mountain belt derived by landslide mapping. Geology, Volume 25, pp. 231–324.

4. Hovius N., Stark C., Hao-Tsu C., Jiun-Chuan L. (2000) Supply and removal of sediment in a landslide-dominated mountain belt: Central Range, Taiwan. J. Geol., Volume 108, pp. 73–89.

5. Imaizumi F., Sidle R. (2007) Linkage of sediment supply and transport processes in Miyagawa Dam catchment, Japan. J. Geophys. Res, Volume 112, no. F3,

6. Larsen I.J., Montgomery D.R., Korup O. Landslide erosion controlled by hill slope material. Nature Geosciences, 2010, 3. pp. 247–251.

7. Lave J., Burbank D. (2004) Denudation processes and rates in the Transverse Ranges, southern California: Erosional response of a transitional landscape to external and anthropogenic forcing. J. Geophys. Res, Volume 109, pp. 1–3.

8. Simonett D.S. (1967) Landslide distribution and earthquakes in the Bewani Tor-ricelli Mountains, New Guinea. Jennings J.N., Mabbutt. Landform from Australia and New Guinea. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, pp. 64–84.

Citation:

Ganiyeva S.A.,

Mehdiyev J.T.,

(2016) The new methodics for computing of probability parameters of landslide occurance. Geodesy and cartography = Geodezia i Kartografia, (5), pp. 31-33. (In Russian). DOI: 10.22389/0016-7126-2016-911-5-31-33