UDC: 
DOI: 
10.22389/0016-7126-2016-914-8-31-34
1 Kerimov R.M.
Year: 
№: 
914
Pages: 
31–34

Azerbaujan National Aerocosmic Agency

1, 
Abstract:
It is well-known that in regard of optical remote sensing devices the instrument function determines the distribution of illumination in the image of point type source of light developed by device. The measured and modeled instrument function of sensor systems determines that significant part of registered signal which comes from not only from central pixel but also from neighbor pixels. These effects of interaction of pixels can be assessed using both the instrument function of remote sensing system which characterized the reaction of the system on point type signal but also using the Furies transformation of instrument function. For spectroradiometer, installed in the satellite such mutual interaction effect of pixels is of high importance due to various atmospheric effects and deviation from nadir. The suggested methodic of selection of parameters for evaluation of characteristics of single line remote sensing system related with the systems instrument function envisages determination the scalar convolution and carrying out the multicriteria optimization It is shown that the suggested method is universal and can be applied for matrix type images.
References: 
1.   Barker J.L., Burelhach J.W. (1992) MODIS image simulation from Landsat TM imagery. ASPRS/ACSM/RT 92 Bethesda, American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Washington, DC, pp. 156–165.
2.   Forster B.C., Best P. (1994) Estimation of SPOT P-mode point spread function and derivation of a deconvolution filter. Journ. of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, no. 49, pp. 32–42.
3.   Frieden B.R. (1980) Statistical models for the image restoration problem. Computer Graphics and Image Processing, no. 12, pp. 40–59.
4.   Huang Ch., Townshend I.R.G., Liang Sh., Kalluri S.N.V., DeFries R.S. (2002) Impact of sensorʼs point spread function on land cover characterization: assessment and deconvolution. Remote Sensing of Environment, no. 80, pp. 203–212.
5.   Press W.H., Teukolsky S.A., Vetterling W.T., Flannery B.P. (1992) Numeric recipes in C: the art of scientific computing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
6.   Townshend J.R.G. (1981) Spatial resolution of satellite images. Progress in Physical Geography, no. 5, pp. 33–55.
7.   Williams C.S., Becklund O.A. (1989) Introduction to the optical transfer function. Wiley, New York,
Citation:
Kerimov R.M., 
(2016) Assessment of mutual interference effect of pixels taking into account the instrument function of satellites scaner system. Geodesy and cartography = Geodezia i Kartografia, (8), pp. 31–34. (In Russian). DOI: 10.22389/0016-7126-2016-914-8-31-34
Publication History
Received: 16.02.2016
Accepted: 13.05.2016
Published: 20.09.2016

Authors:

Baku Azerbaijan

Content

2016 August DOI:
10.22389/0016-7126-2016-914-8

QR-code page

QR-код страницы