DOI: 
10.22389/0016-7126-2018-931-1-20-31
1 Abalakov A.D.
2 Basarova N.B.
Year: 
№: 
931
Pages: 
20-31

Sochava Institute of Geography SB RAS

1, 
2, 
Abstract:
Of great importance is the assessment of ecological and geographical position of protected territories of Federal significance: reserves, national parks and protected areas in the territorial strcture of the mining industry in the Baikal region. The study was carried out at the level of municipal districts, subjects of the Russian Federation and ecological zones of the Baikal natural territory. The principles of «positioning» and «polarized landscapes» are applied in assessing the ecological and geographical situation of specially protected natural areas. Knots of technogenic destruction of various rank are allocated. As the estimated indicators, the areas of land that were disturbed during the development of deposits within these nodes, the density of violations in administrative areas, the level of toxicity of raw materials, the distance from specially protected natural areas to sites of technogenic destruction were taken as estimates. Based on these indicators, an assessment is made of the environmental hazard of the technogenic impact of the mining industry on specially protected natural areas. Specific examples of the strongest impact are given. Research materials are presented in cartographic form.
References: 
1.   Abalakov A.D., Basarova N.B. (2017) Specially protected natural areas in the ecological structure of the mining industry of the Baikal region: cartographic representation. Geodezia i Kartografia, 930(12), pp. 9-20. (In Russian). DOI: 10.22389/0016-7126-2017-930-12-9-20.
2.   Kalabin G. V., Moiseenko T. I. Gornyj V. I., Kritsuk S. G., Soromotin A. V. Sputnirovyj monitoring prirodnoj sredy pri otkrytoj razrabotke Olimpiadinskogo zolotorudnogo mestorozdeniya. Gornaya ekologiya, 2013, no. 1, pp. 177–184.
3.   Kalikhman T. P., Bogdanov V. N., Ogorodnikova L. Yu. Osobo ohranyaemye prirodnye territorii Sibirskogo federalnogo okruga. Atlas. Irkutsk: Izd-vo «Ottisk», 2012, 384 p.
4.   Ratanova M. P. Tipologiya promyshlennyh uzlov po ih vozdejstviuy na okruzauyshchuu sredu. Geograficheskoe prognozirovanie i okhrana prirody, Moscow: izd. MGU, 1990, pp. 120–128.
5.   Rzhevsky V. V., Bolotova L. E. Ekologiya gornogo proizvodstva. Moscow: Izd. Moscow Mining Institute, 1988, 243 p.
6.   Rodoman B. B. Pozicionnyj princip i davlenie mesta. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 5. Geografiya, 1979, 4. pp. 14–20.
7.   Rodoman B. B. Polyarizovannaj biosfera. Smolensk: Oykumena, 2002, 336 p.
8.   Safrygin M., Kozlova N. Promyshlennyj simbioz kak instrument mezotraslevogo vzaimodejstviya. Ekonomicheskie nauki i prikladnye issledovaniya: fundamentalnye problemу modernizacii ekonomiki Rossii: Sb. nauch. trudov XI Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf., posvyaschennoy 110-letiyu ekonomicheskogo obrazovaniya v Tomskom politekhnicheskom universitete, Tomsk: Izd-vo Tomskogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta, 2014, pp. 268–270.
9.   Golev A., Corder G. (2014) Global systems for industrial ecology and recycling of metals in Australia. Research report. Prepared for Wealth from Waste Cluster, by the Centre for Social Responsibility in Mining, Sustainable Minerals Institute, The University of Queensland, Australia, Brisbane, pp. 34.
10.   Usher A. Mining in Indonesia taking a heavy social, environmental toll. URL: https://news.mongabay.com/2013/06/mining-in-indonesia-taking-a-heavy-social-environmental-toll
Citation:
Abalakov A.D., 
Basarova N.B., 
(2018) Assessment of the technogenic impact of the mining industry Baikal region for specially protected natural territories: cartographic analysis. Geodesy and cartography = Geodezia i Kartografia, 931(1), pp. 20-31. (In Russian). DOI: 10.22389/0016-7126-2018-931-1-20-31
Publication History
Received: 21.07.2017
Accepted: 02.11.2017
Published: 20.02.2018

Content

2018 January DOI:
10.22389/0016-7126-2018-931-1

QR-code page

QR-код страницы