Thematic structure of the GIS database Khabarovsk city protected areas

Ecology

UDC:

528.9:004.6(571.62)

DOI:

10.22389/0016-7126-2020-961-7-56-64

1 Morozova G.Yu.

2 Debelaia I.D.

Year:

2020

№:

961

Pages:

56-64

IWEP FEB RAS

1,

2,

Abstract:

Protected areas are key elements of the green infrastructure and ecological framework of cities. They have multifunctional significance as centers of investment attractiveness. The percentage of protected zones in the city’s total area is an indicator of its sustainable development. Their total area in Khabarovsk is 567.8 ha (1.5% of the city area): 5 protected areas of regional level (210.7 ha), and 24 are those of local one (357.1 ha). The problems of creating a thematic structure of a GIS database by the example of the network of Khabarovsk protected areas for the urban area environmental planning are considered. A hierarchical thematic structure of a GIS database is presented, consisting of two blocks: an overview of the protected areas network (municipal management) and a description of protected areas (object-level). The blocks include the following modules: administrative, scientific, recreational, educational and economic ones. The thematic structure of a GIS database model "Protected areas of Khabarovsk" is universal and can be used to protect and develop a network of protected areas in any Russian city. The content part of each module is formed by domain experts and adapted for various user groups. Practical applications of the research results are: environmental planning of the urban territory, municipal management, environmental-friendly innovative development of protected areas.

Keywords:

ecosystem services, GIS, municipal administration, protected areas database, protected areas in the cities, thematic structure of the GIS

The authors are grateful to G.I. Mikhailova for technical assistance in preparing this artikle.

References:

1. Vizgalov D. V. Metody otsenki munitsipal'nykh programm. Moskva: Fond «Institut ekonomiki goroda», 2004, 108 p.

2. Zaitsev O. B., Polyakov V. E. Osobo okhranyaemye prirodnye territorii goroda Ekaterinburga. Ekaterinburg: «Izdatel'skii dom «Azhur», 2015, 46 p.

3. Kustov M. V., Loginova N. N., Semina I. A. Ispol'zovanie GIS-tekhnologii dlya obespecheniya ustoichivogo razvitiya gorodskikh territorii. Materialy Mezhdunar. konf. «InterKartoInterGIS», Vladivostok: OOO «K i partnery», 2004, Vol. 10, pp. 61–67.

4. Likhomanov O. V., Bubnov D. V. Denezhnaya otsenka sredozashchitnykh funktsii lesa (na primere lesov i lesnykh nasazhdenii Volgogradskoi oblasti). Vestn. Volgogr. gos. un-ta. Ser. 3. Ekonomika. Ekologiya, 2012, no. 2 (21), pp. 214–220.

5. Morozova G. Yu., Debelaya I. D. Zelenaya infrastruktura kak faktor obespecheniya ustoichivogo razvitiya Khabarovska. Ekonomika regiona, 2018, Vol. 14, 2. pp. 562–574. DOI: 10.17059/2018-2-18.

6. Stadolin M. E., Yamchuk E. V. Osobo okhranyaemye prirodnye territorii mestnogo znacheniya: problemy upravleniya i razvitiya. Vestnik universiteta, 2017, no. 3, pp. 195–199.

7. Bishop K., Dudley N., Phillips A., Stolton S. (2006) Speaking a Common Language. Uses and performance of the IUCN System of Management Categories for Protected Areas. M.: R. Valent. 195 p.

8. Geneletti D., Van Duren I. (2008) Protected area zoning for conservation and use: a GIS-based integration of multicriteria and multiobjective analysis. Landscape and Urban Planning, no. 85, pp. 97-110.

9. (2013) Green infrastructure. An integrated approach to land use. Position Statement. Landscape Institude. URL: https://www.landscapeinstitute.org/policy/green-infrastructure/ (accessed: 04.02.2018).

10. Trzyna T. (2014) Urban Protected Areas: Profiles and best practice guidelines. Best Practice Protected Area Guidelines. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN. Series 22. 110 p.

Citation:

Morozova G.Yu.,

Debelaia I.D.,

(2020) Thematic structure of the GIS database Khabarovsk city protected areas. Geodesy and cartography = Geodezia i Kartografia, 81(7), pp. 56-64. (In Russian). DOI: 10.22389/0016-7126-2020-961-7-56-64