DOI: 
10.22389/0016-7126-2020-963-9-14-29
1 Kuzmin S.B.
2 Lopatkin D.A.
Year: 
№: 
963
Pages: 
14-29

Sochava Institute of Geography SB RAS

1, 
2, 
Abstract:
The authors present a method of assessing the risk of nature management and its mapping in the Russian Federation constituent entities and those of the Siberian Federal District. The assessments were carried out for a comprehensive analysis of the Russian Federation Districts as a single administrative-territorial entity according to their own established factors of environmentally dangerous processes and the parameters of protection against natural disasters. The risk of nature management equally depends on both the type of the danger and the protection against natural disasters, in other words – on both the natural and socio-economic situation in the Russian Federation Districts. In many cases, the indicator of protection against natural disasters plays even a leading part, since its assessment includes current socio-economic characteristics that determine the real ability of management structures to predict and deal with the consequences of natural disasters, as well as psychological indicators, i.e. the will and sequence of the managers’ actions in making specific resolutions on environmental management under risky conditions.
References: 
1.   Analysis, forecast and management of natural risks in the modern world. Ed. V. I. Osipov. Moskva: Publishing House of RUDN, 2015, 582 p.
2.   Adamesku A. A., Granberg A. G., Kistanov V. V. Gosudarstvenno-territorial'noe ustroistvo Rossii (ekonomicheskie i pravovye osnovy). Moskva: Deka, 2003, 448 p.
3.   Berlyant A. M. Kartografiya. Moskva: Aspekt Press, 2002, 336 p.
4.   Granberg A. G., Suslov V. I., Suspitsyn S. A. Mnogoregional'nye sistemy: ekonomiko-matematicheskoe issledovanie. Novosibirsk: Sibirskoe nauchnoe izd-vo, 2007, 370 p.
5.   Glushkova V. G. Federal'nye okruga Rossiiskoi Federatsii. Regional'naya ekonomika. Moskva: KNORUS, 2011, 344 p.
6.   Gokhberg M. Ya. Federal'nye okruga Rossiiskoi Federatsii. Analiz i perspektivy razvitiya. Moskva: Finansy i statistika, 2002, 357 p.
7.   Nerovnykh A. N., Zavorotnyi A. G., Butenko V. M. Opasnye prirodnye protsessy. Moskva: Akademiya GPS MChS Rossii, 2015, 306 p.
8.   Salishchev K.A. Kartografiya. M.: Vysshaya shkola, 1982, 271 p.
9.   Sergeev V. S. Zashchita naseleniya i territorii v chrezvychainykh situatsiyakh. Moskva: Akademicheskii proekt, 2016, 464 p.
10.   Upravlenie riskami tekhnogennykh katastrof i stikhiinykh bedstvii. Pod red. M. I. Faleeva. Moskva: FGBU VNII GOChS, 2016, 270 p.
11.   Berz G., Kron W., Loster T. R. et al. (2001) World map of natural hazards: a global view of the distribution and intensity of significant exposures. Natural Hazards. pp. 2-3.
12.   Ferris E., Petz D. (2013) In the Neighborhood: The Growing Role of Regional Organizations in Disaster Risk Management. The Brookings Institution Press, Washington, 98 p.
13.   Hollis S. (2015) The Role of Regional Organizations in Disaster Risk Management: A Strategy for Global Resilience. Palgrave MacMillan UK Press, London, 242 p.
14.   Holzheu T., Turner G. (2018) The natural catastrophe protection gap: measurement, root causes and ways of addressing underinsurance for extreme events. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance, Volume 43, no. 1, pp. 37-71.
15.   Mohajan H. K. (2015) Sustainable Development Policy of Global Economy. American Journal of Environmental Protection, no. 3, pp. 12-29.
Citation:
Kuzmin S.B., 
Lopatkin D.A., 
(2020) Mapping nature management risk in the Russian Federation Districts. Geodesy and cartography = Geodezia i Kartografia, 81(9), pp. 14-29. (In Russian). DOI: 10.22389/0016-7126-2020-963-9-14-29
Publication History
Received: 23.12.2019
Accepted: 26.05.2020
Published: 20.10.2020

Content

2020 September DOI:
10.22389/0016-7126-2020-963-9

QR-code page

QR-код страницы