UDC: 
DOI: 
10.22389/0016-7126-2023-995-5-2-8
1 Petrosyan H.S.
2 Hambardzumyan P.V.
3 Tsaturyan A.S.
4 Nalbandyan G.P.
5 Petrosyan S.K.
Year: 
№: 
995
Pages: 
2-8

National University of Architecture and Construction of Armenia

1, 
2, 
3, 
4, 
Abstract:
The relevance and role of automatic monitoring systems for buildings-and-structures’ foundations sediments, deformations, technological equipment, etc. at preventing emergencies and elimination of man-made disasters constantly increases. In geodetic instrumentation in this field, the most easily automated method is hydrostatic leveling, where we use the characteristics of the liquids always settling at the same level in communicating vessels, and the distance is measured from the edge of the sensor’s vessel to the surface of the aqua. In order to simplify the process of this measurement, a new method was developed, where the level in all receptacle sensors rises evenly until it contacts the fixed electrodes instead of mechanical moving the contact electrode. The authors present the theoretical and experimental results of the hydrodynamic leveling system further improvement. In particular, it is proposed that instead of uniformly raising the leveling tank and creating a liquid rush under the influence of which a stationary movement is created, this pressure in relation to its level in the sensors is installed in a stationary tank in advance, equipping its solenoid valve, which opens when measurements are started.
References: 
1.   Barkhudaryan A. M., Movsesyan R. A. Teoreticheskie osnovy metoda gidrodinamicheskogo nivelirovaniya. Izvestia vuzov. Geodesy and Aerophotosurveying, 1976, no. 1, pp. 9–14.
2.   Barkhudaryan A. M., Movsesyan R. A., Ambartsumyan P. V. Opredelenie prevyshenii pri gidrodinamicheskom nivelirovanii. Izv. AN ArmSSR, 1983, Vol. ХХХVI, no. 2, pp. 33–37.
3.   Beglaryan A. G., Petrosyan O. S., Arutyunyan N. O. Neobkhodimost' sozdaniya vozle Erevana geodinamicheskogo poligona i ego problemy. Vestnik stroitelei Armenii, 2009, no. 10–11 (146–147), pp. 16–29.
4.   Vasyutinskii I. Yu. Gidronivelirovanie. Moskva: Nedra, 1983, 184 p.
5.   Tamme L. Ya. Ob eksperimental'nykh rabotakh po peredache vysot metodom gidrostaticheskogo nivelirovaniya. Tr. TsNIIGAiK, 1972, 169. pp. 27–45.
6.   Taplashvili I.A., Hambardzumyan P.V., Zeytagyan A.S., Trozyan K.R. (1984) Options for measuring the elevation of the method of hydrodynamic leveling. Geodezia i Kartografia, 45(1), pp. 30–34.
7.   Afrasteh Y., Slobbe D. C., Verlaan M., Sacher M., Klees R., Guarneri H., Keyzer L., Pietrzak J., Snellen M., Zijl F. (2021) The potential impact of hydrodynamic leveling on the quality of the European vertical reference frame. Journal of Geodesy, no. 95, DOI: 10.1007/s00190-021-01543-3.
8.   Movsesian R. H., Barkhudarian A. M. (1979) The Theorу of Hydrodynamic Levelling. Geodesy Mapping and Fotogrammetry, Volume 17, no. 2, pp. 77–82.
Citation:
Petrosyan H.S., 
Hambardzumyan P.V., 
Tsaturyan A.S., 
Nalbandyan G.P., 
Petrosyan S.K., 
(2023) Substitution of the kinematic mode for dynamic one at hydrodynamic leveling. Geodesy and cartography = Geodezia i Kartografia, 84(5), pp. 2-8. (In Russian). DOI: 10.22389/0016-7126-2023-995-5-2-8