UDC: 
DOI: 
10.22389/0016-7126-2025-1015-1-21-29
1 Novikov Yu.A.
Year: 
№: 
1015
Pages: 
21-29

Industrial University of Tyumen

1, 
Abstract:
Taking into account the specifics of permafrost and soil conditions, it is important to pay attention to the role of the initial temperature regime. Its change, caused by a combination of various factors, can affect the further operation of the facility. The author presents the results of a survey, annual observation of the vertical movements' development and thermophysical ones of a public building on permafrost soils. Geotechnical equipment location diagrams, final graphs of vertical displacements and temperature measurements are given. The reasons for increasing irreversible deformities causing the accident risk of the investigated object were determined. An opinion on the need of creating a unified geotechnical monitoring database, which would allow responding to changing operating conditions of buildings and structures on permafrost soils quickly in order to implement appropriate forecast solutions and avoid emergencies was expressed
References: 
1.   Vasil’yev G.G., Dzhalyabov A.A., Leonovich I.A. Deformatsionnyi monitoring stroitel’nykh konstruktsii ploshchadochnykh ob”ektov neftegazovogo kompleksa na mnogoletnemerzlykh gruntakh. Transport i khranenie nefteproduktov i uglevodorodnogo syr’ya, 2020, no. 5-6, pp. 34-39.
2.   Gilev N.G., Attorney Yu.S., Pavlov M.S., Zenkov E.V., Shestakov D.Yu., Popov A.A. Geotekhnicheskii monitoring ob”ektov neftegazodobychi v kriolitozone. Fundamenty, 2021, no. 4(6), pp. 34-36.
3.   Efremov V.N. Otsenka vliyaniya klimaticheskikh faktorov na sostoyanie mnogoletnemerzlykh gruntov po dannym monitoringa ikh effektivnogo elektricheskogo soprotivleniya. Prirodnye resursy Arktiki i Subarktiki, 2018, Vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 55-63.
4.   Lychkovsky A.A., Lutsky S.Ya. Osobennosti geotekhnicheskogo monitoringa sooruzheniya zemlyanogo polotna na mnogoletnemerzlykh gruntakh. Vestnik Sibirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta putei soobshcheniya, 2022, no. 3(62), pp. 23-30.
5.   Novikov Yu. A., Kraev A. N. Geodezicheskie nablyudeniya za osadkami zdaniya v ramkakh provedeniya geotekhnicheskogo monitoringa. Vestnik SSUGT, 2019, Vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 28–41. DOI: 10.33764/2411-1759-2019-24-1-28-41.
6.   Popova A.A. Problemy geotekhnicheskogo monitoringa na mnogoletnemerzlykh gruntakh. Fundamenty, 2021, no. 4(6), pp. 24-27.
7.   Pronina L.A., Bashirova A.R., Novikova V.E. Geodezicheskii monitoring deformatsii zdanii i sooruzhenii gazokondensatnogo kompleksa. Ustoichivoe razvitie zemel’no-imushchestvennogo kompleksa munitsipal’nogo obrazovaniya: zemleustroitel’noe, kadastrovoe i geodezicheskoe soprovozhdenie: Sbornik materialov I Natsional’noi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii, Omsk: Omskii gosudarstvennyi agrarnyi universitet imeni P.A. Stolypina, 2020, pp. 174-179.
8.   Razvitie geokriologicheskogo monitoringa prirodnykh i tekhnicheskikh ob”ektov v kriolitozone Rossiiskoi Federatsii na osnove sistem geotekhnicheskogo monitoringa toplivno-energeticheskogo kompleksa. V.P. Melnikov, V.I. Osipov, A.V. Brushkov i drugie.Kriosfera Zemli, 2022, Vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 3-18. DOI: 10.15372/KZ20220401.
Citation:
Novikov Yu.A., 
(2025) Experience of using geotechnical monitoring under permafrost conditions (the example of a public building in Salekhard, RF). Geodesy and cartography = Geodezia i Kartografia, 86(1), pp. 21-29. (In Russian). DOI: 10.22389/0016-7126-2025-1015-1-21-29
Publication History
Received: 20.02.2024
Accepted: 17.12.2024
Published: 20.02.2025

Content

2025 January DOI:
10.22389/0016-7126-2025-1015-1