UDC: 
DOI: 
10.22389/0016-7126-2026-1031-5-31-43
1 Loginov D.S.
Year: 
№: 
1031
Pages: 
31-43

Moscow State University of Geodesy and Cartography (MIIGAiK)

1, 
Abstract:
The authors present the results of developing a scientific and methodological framework for a cartographic support system of scientific and technical activities. The theoretical basis is a new methodological principle of systematic preparing and using digital cartographic and geoinformation products. The main scenarios for implementing the said support are characterized as a set of interactions between system components and process participants. Its aspects are identified as the system`s emergent properties. The process is formalized according to the terms of Geovisualization concept, and includes the study of reality’s aspects for decision-making with cartographic materials and spatial data. The complex of methodological and algorithmic solutions, aimed at systematic use of the latest software in preparation of modern products, forms the basis of a methodology for studying cartographic support in various fields of scientific and technical activity. Its stages are considered at the technological level in case of subsoil use as a strategic economic sector. The results of the study lay the foundation for timely adaptation of digital cartographic production to the current needs of scientific and technical activities in the context of digitalization and intellectualization of economic sectors
References: 
1.   Vitsentii A. V., Shishaev M. G., Gogoberidze G. G. Razrabotka tekhnologii geovizualizatsii dlya sistem informatsionnoi podderzhki zadach prostranstvennogo planirovaniya s uchetom interesov i protivorechii razlichnykh grupp prirodopol'zovatelei na osnove kontseptual'noi modeli konflikta. Trudy Kol'skogo nauchnogo tsentra RAN, 2018, Vol. 9, no. 10-9, pp. 91–98. DOI: 10.25702/KSC.2307-5252.2018.10.91-98.
2.   Goncharenko S. N. Geoprostranstvennoe obespechenie i metody postroeniya programmy analiticheskogo kontrolya kachestva provedeniya geologorazvedochnykh rabot na mestorozhdenii. Vestnik SSUGT, 2021, Vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 71–86. DOI: 10.33764/2411-1759-2021-26-3-71-86.
3.   Elyushkin V. G. Geoinformatsionnoe obespechenie voennykh deistvii. Ot dostatochnosti k prevoskhodstvu. 2-e izdanie, dopolnennoe i ispravlennoe. Moskva, 2019, 166 p. URL: https://clck.ru/33Y5BY (accessed: 15.03.2022).
4.   Zaliznyuk A. N., Gomanov D. E., Fisich B. A. Postroenie kontseptsii geoinformatsionnogo obespecheniya operatsii (boevykh deistvii). Voennaya mysl', 2018, no. 10, pp. 39–47.
5.   Karpik A. P., Lisitskii D. V. Perspektivy razvitiya geodezicheskogo i kartograficheskogo proizvodstva i novaya paradigma geoprostranstvennoi deyatel'nosti. Vestnik SSUGT, 2020, Vol. 2, pp. 19–29. DOI: 10.33764/2411-1759-2020-25-2-19-29.
6.   Lazareva O. S., Lazarev O. E. Geoinformatsionnoe kartograficheskoe obespechenie investitsionnoi privlekatel'nosti munitsipal'nogo obrazovaniya. Vestnik Tverskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Geografiya i geoekologiya, 2020, no. 4 (32), pp. 80–84. DOI: 10.26456/2226-7719-2020-4-80-84.
7.   Loginov D.S. (2026) Cartographic support as a process: conceptual model of system and its application. Geodezia i Kartografia, 87(2), pp. 10-22. (In Russian). DOI: 10.22389/0016-7126-2026-1028-2-10-22.
8.   Loginov D. S. Metodologiya otsenki realizatsii kartograficheskogo obespecheniya nauchno-proizvodstvennoi deyatel'nosti. Vestnik SSUGT, 2025, Vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 70–79. DOI: 10.33764/2411-1759-2025-30-6-70-79.
9.   Podryadchikova E. D. Razvitie geoprostranstvennogo obespecheniya marksheidersko-geodezicheskoi informatsii v usloviyakh tsifrovizatsii i intellektualizatsii. Integral, 2025, no. 2, pp. 37–49. DOI: 10.55186/2658-3569-2025-2-37-49.
10.   Poshivailo Ya. G., Lisitskii D. V. Formalizatsiya predstavleniya tekhnologicheskikh protsessov kartografirovaniya na osnove sistemno-tekhnicheskogo analiza. Informatsiya i kosmos, 2023, no. 2, pp. 106–113.
11.   Ryl'skii I. A., Gribok M. V., Eremchenko E. N., Panin A. N. Lazernoe skanirovanie i obespechenie prostranstvennymi dannymi v epokhu tsifrovoi ekonomiki. Vestnik nauki i obrazovaniya, 2020, no. 12-1 (90), pp. 45–55.
12.   Filatov V. N., Yablonskii L. I. Sovremennoe sostoyanie i perspektivy integratsionnogo strukturnogo razvitiya sistemy obespecheniya prostranstvennymi dannymi. Informatsiya i kosmos, 2021, no. 1, pp. 116–120.
13.   Chernykh D. V., Indyukova M. A., Lubenets L. F. Informatsionno-kartograficheskoe obespechenie prirodno-khozyaistvennogo raionirovaniya rossiiskoi chasti Altae-Sayanskogo regiona. Izvestiya Altaiskogo otdeleniya Russkogo geograficheskogo obshchestva, 2017, no. 1 (44), pp. 34–41.
14.   Yankelevich S. S. Issledovanie protsessa polucheniya geoprostranstvennykh znanii o territorii. Geoinformatika, 2024, no. 2, pp. 64–70. DOI: 10.47148/1609-364X-2024-2-64-70.
15.   Bandrova T., Dinkov D., Vasilev S. (2025) Strategy for the development of cartography in Bulgaria with a 10-year planning horizon (2025–2035) in the context of Industry 4.0 and 5.0. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, no. 14 (8), DOI: 10.3390/ijgi14080289.
16.   Buckley A. R., Case N. (2025) Introduction to Ethics in Cartography. Cartographic Perspectives, no. 105, pp. 5–12. DOI: 10.14714/CP105.1997.
17.   Fitzpatrick M., Hedley N. (2024) Review of the state of practice in geovisualization in the geosciences. Frontiers in Earth Science, no. 11:1230973, DOI: 10.3389/feart.2023.1230973.
18.   Hopfstock A., Buchroithner M. F., Grünreich D. (2013) A conceptual framework for creating cartographic representations in SDI environments. The Cartographic Journal, no. 50 (4), pp. 345–355. DOI: 10.1179/1743277413Y.0000000033.
19.   MacEachren A. M., Kraak M-J. (2001) Research Challenges in Geovisualization. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, no. 28 (1), pp. 3–12. DOI: 10.1559/152304001782173970.
20.   Panchaud N. H., Hurni L. (2018) Integrating cartographic knowledge within a geoportal: interactions and feedback in the user interface. Cartographic Perspectives, no. 89, pp. 5–24. DOI: 10.14714/CP89.1402.
21.   Prestby T. J. (2025) Situating trust in cartography: why do people trust maps and what does trust in maps mean?. Cartographic Perspectives, no. 106, pp. 10–27. DOI: 10.14714/CP106.1903.
22.   Rhyne T. M., MacEachrenA. M., Gahegan M., Pike W., Brewer I., Cai G., Lengerich E., Hardisty F. (2004) Geovisualization for knowledge construction and decision support. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, no. 24 (1), pp. 13–17. DOI: 10.1109/MCG.2004.1255801.
23.   Xu H., Ai T., Qingsheng G., Xiao Y. (2023) From maps to geospatial knowledge graph: geospatial knowledge representation and reasoning. Abstracts of the ICA, Volume 6: 279, DOI: 10.5194/ica-abs-6-279-2023.
Citation:
Loginov D.S., 
(2026) Systematic cartographic support for scientific and technical activities: methodology and process formalization. Geodesy and cartography = Geodeziya i Kartografiya, 87(5), pp. 31-43. (In Russian). DOI: 10.22389/0016-7126-2026-1031-5-31-43
Publication History
Received: 30.07.2025
Accepted: 14.05.2026
Published: 20.06.2026

Content

2026 May DOI:
10.22389/0016-7126-2026-1031-5