UDC: 
DOI: 
10.22389/0016-7126-2026-1032-6-13-23
1 Vorobev A.V.
2 Vorobeva G.R.
Year: 
№: 
1032
Pages: 
13-23

RAS Geophysical Center

1, 

Ufa University of Science and Technology

2, 
Abstract:
The problem of gap filling in the data from high-latitude magnetic stations, critical for ensuring the continuity of geophysical observations and space weather monitoring, is considered. The relevance of the study is due to the high dynamics of the geomagnetic field in the auroral zone, where traditional interpolation methods may be rather insufficient. A geostatistical approach to interpolation of minute values of the eastward geomagnetic field component based on ordinary kriging using the GSTools library is proposed. The method was tested on the SuperMAG network data from ten high-latitude stations for the period of 2019-2020 with the target one of Lovozero (LOZ). A comparative analysis of the kriging efficiency and the inverse distance weighting method for various gap durations and levels of geomagnetic activity, classified by the SME index, was made. We found out that the IDW method yields unsatisfactory results (negative R2 values), while kriging provides consistently positive ones: the coefficient of determination ranges from 0,64 under calm conditions for 5-minute gaps to 0,07 under those of storm for hourly intervals. The applicability limits of the method are determined, enabling development of recommendations for the practical use of reconstructed data
This work was funded by the Russian Science Foundation (project No. 21-77-30010-P)
References: 
1.   Izmailov A. F., Kurennoi A. S., Stetsyuk P. I. Metod Levenberga – Markvardta dlya zadach bezuslovnoi optimizatsii. Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Seriya: estestvennye i tekhnicheskie nauki, 2019, Vol. 24, no. 125, pp. 60–74. DOI: 10.20310/1810-0198-2019-24-125-60-74.
2.   Barkhatov N. A., Revunov S. E., Smirnova Zh. V., Cherney O. T., Mukhina M. V. (2020) Recovery of gaps in records of geomagnetic observatories by neural network. International Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering Research, no. 8 (4), pp. 1243–1246. DOI: 10.30534/IJETER/2020/48842020.
3.   Benmoshe N. (2025) A simple solution for the inverse distance weighting interpolation (IDW) clustering problem. Sci, no. 7 (1), DOI: 10.3390/sci7010030.
4.   Gjerloev J. W. (2012) The SuperMAG data processing technique. Journal of Geophysical Research, no. 117, A09213, DOI: 10.1029/2012JA017683.
5.   Huang Z., Wang H., Zhang R. (2012) An improved kriging interpolation technique based on SVM and its recovery experiment in oceanic missing data. American Journal of Computational Mathematics, no. 2 (1), pp. 56–60. DOI: 10.4236/ajcm.2012.21007.
6.   Li Z. (2021) An enhanced dual IDW method for high-quality geospatial interpolation. Scientific Reports, no. 11 (1), pp. 1–15. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-89172-w.
7.   Love J. J. (2009) Missing data and the accuracy of magnetic-observatory hour means. Annales Geophysicae, no. 27 (9), pp. 3601–3610.
8.   Marquardt D. W. (1963) An Algorithm for Least-Squares Estimation of Nonlinear Parameters. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, no. 11 (2), pp. 431–441.
9.   McLay S. A., Beggan C. D. (2010) Interpolation of externally-caused magnetic fields over large sparse arrays using spherical elementary current systems. Annales Geophysicae, no. 28 (9), pp. 1795–1805. DOI: 10.5194/angeo-28-1795-2010.
10.   Miletiс S., Beloica J., Miljkoviс P. (2025) Integrating environmental variables into geostatistical interpolation: enhancing soil mapping for the MEDALUS model in Montenegro. Land, no. 14 (4), DOI: 10.3390/land14040702.
11.   Muller S., Schüler L., Zech A., Hesse F. (2022) GSTools v1.3: a toolbox for geostatistical modelling in Python. Geoscientific Model Development, no. 15, pp. 3161–3182. DOI: 10.5194/gmd-2021-301.
12.   Newell P. T., Gjerloev J. W. (2011) Evaluation of SuperMAG auroral electrojet indices as indicators of substorms and auroral power. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , no. 116 (12), DOI: 10.1029/2011JA016779.
13.   Nikitenko A. S., Kleimenova N. G., Fedorenko Yu. V., Beketova E. B. (2024) Ground-based observations of the VLF auroral hiss at Lovozero and Barentsburg observatories. Solar-Terrestrial Physics, no. 10 (4), pp. 37–45. DOI: 10.12737/stp-104202405.
14.   Oughton E. J., Skelton A., Horne R. B., Thomson A. W. P., Gaunt C. T. (2017) Quantifying the daily economic impact of extreme space weather due to failure in electricity transmission infrastructure. Space Weather, no. 15 (1), pp. 65–83. DOI: 10.1002/2016SW001491.
15.   Savitzky A., Golay M. J. E. (1964) Smoothing and differentiation of data by simplified least squares procedures. Analytical Chemistry, no. 36 (8), pp. 1627–1639.
16.   Schafer R. W. (2011) What Is a Savitzky-Golay Filter? [Lecture Notes]. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, no. 28 (4), pp. 111–117. DOI: 10.1109/MSP.2011.941097.
17.   Vorobev A. V., Pilipenko V. A. (2021) Geomagnetic data recovery approach based on the concept of digital twins. Solar-Terrestrial Physics, no. 7 (2), pp. 48–56. DOI: 10.12737/stp-72202105.
18.   Vorobev A. V., Soloviev A. A., Pilipenko V. A., Vorobeva G. R., Sakharov Ya. A. (2022) An approach to diagnostics of geomagnetically induced currents based on ground magnetometers data. Applied Sciences, no. 12 (3):1–9, DOI: 10.3390/app12031522.
19.   Yasojima C., Protázio J., Meiguins B., Neto N., Morais J. (2019) A new methodology for automatic cluster-based kriging using k-nearest neighbor and genetic algorithms. Information, no. 10 (11): 357, DOI: 10.3390/info10110357.
20.   Yoon B., Cheong S., Kim G., Son W., Lee C. (2026) Integrated geophysical inversion to investigate two-dimensional fluid distribution in shallow sediments of the Korea Strait. Marine Geophysical Research, Volume 47, no. 3, DOI: 10.1007/s11001-025-09600-8.
Citation:
Vorobev A.V., 
Vorobeva G.R., 
(2026) Geostatistical approach to interpolation of high-latitude geomagnetic data. Geodesy and cartography = Geodeziya i Kartografiya, 87(6), pp. 13-23. (In Russian). DOI: 10.22389/0016-7126-2026-1032-6-13-23