UDC: 
DOI: 
10.22389/0016-7126-2020-965-11-29-39
1 Tararin A.M.
2 Belyaev V.L.
Year: 
№: 
965
Pages: 
29-39

Moscow State University of Geodesy and Cartography (MIIGAiK)

1, 

Moscow State University of Civil Engineering

2, 
Abstract:
In the view of the sections of the state information system for ensuring urban planning activities, the place is shown and the role in regulating the development of territories is revealed. The composition of spatial data contained in various types and sections of urban planning documentation is analyzed. A review of world practice has shown that many of the analyzed spatial data are included in national spatial data infrastructures, which indicates their high level of signifi cance. Consideration of the issues of updating graphic documents by maintaining duty plans of urban planning information using GIS technologies revealed the need to consolidate secondary (updated) documents at the legislative level. An analysis of the requirements for spatial data in the fi eld of urban planning and the real estate cadastre showed the need for their refi nement in terms of clarifying the requirements for the accuracy of describing the objects of urban planning activities and unifying the coordinate systems used. Proposals are given for the establishment of uniform requirements for methods for determining the coordinates of spatial objects and the rules for determining the permissible discrepancy, as well as requirements for the accuracy of determining the coordinates of the characteristic points of the boundaries of objects of urban planning activities.
References: 
1.   Belyayev V. L., Dorofeyev M. V. Tendentsii, problemy i perspektivy razvitiya informatsionnogo obespecheniya gradostroitel’nogo osvoyeniya podzemnogo prostranstva. Velikiye reki – 2018, 2018, pp. 367–371.
2.   Beregovskikh A. N. Transformatsiya sistemy upravleniya v gradostroitel’stve kak vazhneyshaya mera obespecheniya proryva sotsial’no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya Rossii. Sbornik nauchnykh trudov RAASN, Moscow: Rossiyskaya akademiya arkhitektury i stroitel’nykh nauk, 2019, pp. 206–213.
3.   Goryanova O. F. Sovremennyye problemy opredeleniya granits territorial’nykh zon. Interekspo Geo-Sibir’, 2016, Vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 138–142.
4.   Zhukhovitskiy G. M., Karpov A. A. Povysheniye effektivnosti gradostroitel’noy deyatel’nosti v rezul’tate razvitiya sistemy vedeniya dezhurnykh planov zastroyennykh territoriy. Vestnik MGSU, 2016, no. 2, pp. 186–193.
5.   Kamynina N. R. Planning and development of urban areas. Vestnik SGUGiT, 2016, 4(36). pp. 184–191.
6.   Karpik A. P. Sovremennaya model’ soglasovaniya i razresheniya sporov o mestopolozhenii granits munitsipal’nykh obrazovaniy. Izv. vuzov. Geodeziya i aerofotos”yemka, 2014, no. 4, pp. 115–121.
7.   Nikol'skiy Ye. K., Tararin A. M. Sovershenstvovaniye normativno-pravovogo i tekhnologicheskogo obespecheniya vedeniya dezhurnogo topografi cheskogo plana goroda masshtaba 1:500. Privolzhskiy nauchnyy zhurnal, 2014, no. 4(32), pp. 224–230.
8.   Strategiya razvitiya stroitel'noy otrasli Rossiyskoy Federatsii do 2030 goda. URL: http://stroystrategy.ru (accessed: 04.10.2019).
9.   Trutnev E. K., Safarova M. D. Gradoregulirovaniye v usloviyakh rynochnoy ekonomiki. Moscow: Izdatel'stvo Delo ANKH, 2009, 368 p.
Citation:
Tararin A.M., 
Belyaev V.L., 
(2020) Spatial data in urban planning. Geodesy and cartography = Geodezia i Kartografia, 81(11), pp. 29-39. (In Russian). DOI: 10.22389/0016-7126-2020-965-11-29-39
Publication History
Received: 13.12.2019
Accepted: 15.07.2020
Published: 20.12.2020

Content

2020 November DOI:
10.22389/0016-7126-2020-965-11