Reviewing the development of geodynamics and geodesic methods for solving geodynamic tasks

Geodynamic research

UDC:

528:551.24

DOI:

10.22389/0016-7126-2020-956-2-25-39

1 Mazurov B.T.

2 Kaftan V.I.

Year:

2020

№:

956

Pages:

25-39

Siberian State University of Geosystems and Technologies

1,

RAS Geophysical Center

2,

Abstract:

Studying the Earth involves estimation of temporal changes of its shape and gravity field. Among the methods that can be used to solve this task, an important place is taken by the geodetic one. A scientific explanation and experimental study of geodynamics began in the 19th century. Many scientists drew attention to the variability of the Earth as a planet in general and its surface. Several different hypotheses explaining surface changes by underlying processes arose. Some ideas, hypotheses and the history of their creation are reviewed in this article. But, changes in the surface and surrounding field of gravity are possible as a result of the activities of human society, it is called technogenic geodynamics. The main reason is developing mineral resources. This concerns to both surface (quarries) and underground (mines for ore extraction, oil and gas production) subsoil use facilities. Thus, the study of geodynamics is an urgent scientific and practical task.

Keywords:

Earth surface change, geodetic method, hypotheses, global, regional and local geodynamics

This work was carried out as part of the state assignments of the Siberian State University of Geosystems and Technologies, as well as the Geophysical Center of the RAS, approved by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russia

References:

1. Alekseev A. S. K razvitiyu kontseptsii mnogodistsiplinarnogo prognoza zemletryasenii. Problemy geofiziki XXI veka: Sb. nauch. tr. v 2 kn. Kn. 2, Moskva: Nauka, 2003, pp. 131–157.

2. Gol'din S. V. Fizika «zhivoi» Zemli. Problemy geofiziki XXI veka. – V 2 kn. – Kn. 1. Otv. red. A. V. Nikolaev. Moskva: Nauka, 2003, 311 p.

3. Efimov A. B., Demin S. S. Issledovanie napryazhenno-deformirovannogo sostoyaniya vblizi magmaticheskogo ochaga. Vulkanologiya i seismologiya, 1979, no. 1, pp. 16 – 27.

4. Kaftan V.I. (1991) Analysis of trigonometric leveling in the area of Tolbachik Volcano. Geodesy and cartography, 52(1), pp. 32–36.

5. Kaftan V. I., Rodkin M. V. Deformatsii raiona vulkana Etny po dannym GPS izmerenii, interpretatsiya, svyaz' s rezhimom vulkanizma. Vulkanologiya i seismologiya, 2019, no. 1, pp. 14–24.

6. Kaftan V. I., Serebryakova L. I. Geodezicheskie metody resheniya geodinamicheskikh zadach (sovremennye dvizheniya zemnoi kory). Geodeziya i aeros"emka. T. 28 (Itogi nauki i tekhniki. VINITI AN SSSR), Moskva: 1990, 150 p.

7. Kolmogorov V. G., Kolmogorova P. P. Sovremennaya kinematika zemnoi poverkhnosti yuga Sibiri. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1990, 153 p.

8. Magnitskii V. A. Vnutrennee stroenie i fizika Zemli. Moskva: Nedra, 1965, 379 p.

9. Mazurov B.T. Identifikaciya napryazhenno-deformirovannogo sostoyaniya vulkanicheskoj oblasti po rezul'tatam geodezicheskih i geofizicheskih nablyudenij. Izv. vuzov. Gornyj zhurnal, 2007, no. 7, pp. 58–62.

10. Mazurov B. T. Matematicheskoe modelirovanie pri issledovanii geodinamiki: Monografiya. Novosibirsk: Sibprint, 2019, 360 p.

11. Mazurov B.T. (2007) Fields of deformations of the Mountainous Altai before the Chui earthquake. Geodesy and cartography, 68(3), pp. 48–50.

12. Molodenskii M.S. (1958) Modern problems of studying the shape of the Earth. Geodesy and cartography, 19(7), pp. 3 – 5.

13. Nikolaev A. V. Cherty geofiziki XXI veka. Problemy geofiziki XXI veka: Sb. nauch. tr. v 2 kn. Kn. 1, Moskva: Nauka, 2003, pp. 7–12.

14. Perepiska. 1859–1904. Per. s nem., fr. i ital. Avt.-sost. i per. V. K. Abalakin. SPb.: Nauka, 2005, 731 p.

15. Pankrushin V. K. Matematicheskoe modelirovanie i identifikatsiya geodinamicheskikh sistem: Monografiya. Novosibirsk: SGGA, 2002, 423 p.

16. Pevnev A. K. Prognoz zemletryasenii – geodezicheskie aspekty problemy. Izv. AN SSSR. Fizika Zemli, 1988, no. 12, pp. 88–98.

17. Pellinen L. P. Vysshaya geodeziya (Teoreticheskaya geodeziya). Moskva: Nedra, 1978, 264 p.

18. Seredovich V. A., Pankrushin V. K., Kuznetsov Yu. I., Mazurov B. T., Lovyagin V. F. Identifikatsiya dvizhenii i napryazhenno-deformirovannogo sostoyaniya samoorganizuyushchikhsya geodinamicheskikh sistem po kompleksnym geodezicheskim i geofizicheskim nablyudeniyam: Monografiya. Novosibirsk: SGGA, 2004, 356 p.

19. Timofeev V. Yu., Ardyukov D. G., Kale E., Duchkov A. D., Zapreeva E. A., Kazantsev S. A., Rusbek F., Bryuniks K. Polya i modeli smeshchenii zemnoi poverkhnosti Gornogo Altaya. Geologiya i geofizika, 2006, Vol. 47, no. 8, pp. 923–937.

20. Savinykh V. P., Yashchenko V. R., Yambaev Kh. K. Geodezicheskie issledovaniya geodinamiki riftovoi zony ozera Baikal. Izv. vuzov. Geodeziya i aerofotos"emka, 2006, no. 5, pp. 3–10.

21. Sadovskii M. A., Pisarenko V. F. Seismicheskii protsess v blokovoi srede. Moskva: Nauka, 1991, 96 p.

22. Serebryakova L.I., Kuznecov Yu. G. (2005) Geodesy and forecast of earthquakes. Geodesy and Cartography, (2), pp. 9-18.

23. Sobolev G. A., Ponomarev A. V. Fizika zemletryasenii i predvestniki. Moskva: Nauka, 2003, 270 p.

24. Strakhov V. N. Dve paradigmy v teorii interpretatsii gravitatsionnykh i magnitnykh anomalii. Izv. AN SSSR. Fizika Zemli, 1987, no. 1, pp. 46–61.

25. Tatevian S.K., Kuzin S.P., Oraevskaya S.P. (2004) The use of satellite positioning systems for geodynamic studies. Geodesy and cartography, 65(6), pp. 33–44.

26. Terkot D., Shubert Dzh. Geodinamika. Geologicheskie prilozheniya fiziki sploshnykh sred: V 2 ch. Per. s angl. S. V. Gavrilova. – Ch. 2. Moskva: Mir, 1985, 730 p.

27. Khain V. E. Geodinamicheskie protsessy. Evolyutsiya vzglyadov i sovremennye predstavleniya. Geofizika okeana, Moskva: Nauka, 1979, 2 Vol. 2, pp. 14–38.

28. Khain V. E. Sovremennaya geodinamika: dostizheniya i problemy. Priroda, 2002, no. 1, pp. 51–59.

29. Khess G. Istoriya okeanicheskikh basseinov. Per. s angl. K. L. Volkovicha, G. I. Denisovoi.Novaya global'naya tektonika: Sb. st, Moskva: Mir, 1974, pp. 9–26.

30. Shestakov N.V., Gerasimenko M.D., Okhzono Mako (2011) Crustal motion and deformation in the Far East of Russia, caused by the earthquake in Tohoku 11/03/2011 and their impact on GNSS-observations results. Geodezia i Kartografia, 72(8), pp. 35-43.

31. Yurkina M.I. Issledovaniya po sovmestnomu opredeleniyu izmenenij zemnogo gravitacionnogo polya i vertikal'nyh dvizhenij zemnoj kory po povtornym gravimetricheskim i nivelirnym nablyudeniyam. Povtornye gravimetricheskie nablyudeniya: Sb. nauch. tr. soveshch. Komis. po izuch. neprilivnyh izmenenij sily tyazhesti (Moskva, mart 1986 g.), M., 1988, pp. 6–22.

32. Bertrand M. (1897) Structures des Alpes francaises et recurrence de certains facies sedi-mentaires. Sixieme Congr. Geol. Int., 1894, C.R., Lausanne. pp. 161-177.

33. Bird P. (2003) An updated digital model for plate boundaries. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, Volume 4, no. 3, DOI: 10.1029/2001GC000252.

34. Bock Y., Prawirodirdjo L., Genrich J. F., Stevens C. W., McCaffrey R., Subarya C., Puntodewo S. S. O., Calais E. (2003) Crustal motion in Indonesia from Global Positioning System measurements. Journal of geophysical research, no. 108, B8, DOI: 10.1029/2001JB000324.

35. Gerasimenko M. D., Gorshkov V. L., Kaftan V. I., Kosarev N. S., Malkin Z. M., Mazurov B. T., Pasynok S. L., Pobedinsky G. G., Popadev V. V., Savinykh V. P., Sermyagin R. A., Shestakov N. V., Steblov G. M., Sugaipova L. S., Ustinov A. V. (2019) National report for the international association of geodesy of the international union of geodesy and geophysics 2015-2018. 99 p. DOI: 10.2205/2019IUGG-RU-IAG.

36. Herring T. A., Hager B. H., Meade B., Zubovich A. V. (2002) Contemporary horizontal and vertical deformation in the Tien Shan. Proc. of the Intern, seminar “On the Use of Space Techniques for Asia-Pacific Regional Crustal Movements Studies”. Moscow: GEOS. pp. 75-84.

37. Jeffries H., Bullen K. E. (1940) Seismological Tables, Edinburgh: Neill & Co. Ltd. 50 p.

38. Kellogg L. H., Hager B. H., van der Hilst R. D. (1999) Compositional stratification in the deep mantle. Science, no. 283 (5409), pp. 1881-1884.

39. Kious W. J., Tilling R.I. (1996) This Dynamic Earth: The Story of Plate Tectonics. Diane Publishing, USA. 77 p.

40. Mogi K. (1958) Relations of eruptions of various volcanoes and the deformation of the ground surface around them. Bull Earthquake Res. Inst., Tokyo Univ. no. 36, pp. 99-134.

41. Reid H.F. (1911) The elastiс-rebound theory of earthquakes. Bulletin of the department of Geology. University of California Publication, no. 6, pp. 413-444.

42. Smith A. D., Lewis Ch. (1999) Differential rotation of lithosphere and mantle and the driving forces of plate tectonics. Journal of Geodynamics, no. 28, pp. 2-3. DOI: 10.1016/S0264-3707(98)00027-1.

43. Wegener A. (1966) The Origin of Continents and Oceans. Dover Publications, Inc. 246 p.

44. Wilson E. B. Some Problems of Geodynamics being an Essay to which the Adams’ Prize in the University of Cambridge was adjudged in 1911. Review: A. E. H. Love.

Citation:

Mazurov B.T.,

Kaftan V.I.,

(2020) Reviewing the development of geodynamics and geodesic methods for solving geodynamic tasks. Geodesy and cartography = Geodezia i Kartografia, 81(2), pp. 25-39. (In Russian). DOI: 10.22389/0016-7126-2020-956-2-25-39