UDC: 
DOI: 
10.22389/0016-7126-2020-958-4-9-18
1 Kornilov Yu.N.
2 Tsareva O.S.
Year: 
№: 
958
Pages: 
9-18

Saint-Petersburg Mining University

1, 

Peter the Great Saint-Petersburg Polytechnic University

2, 
Abstract:
The authors present the peculiarities of evaluating the parameters (module, direction and coordinates of the application point) of the displacement vector of the object’s deformation mark, its stabilitydegree is to be evaluated, and on this basis technologies simplifying the processes of performing field work necessary to obtain relevant information are discussed. Various options to implementpolar spatial intersection during observations from fixed stations are considered. In particular, if there aren’t any connecting marks between the instrument’s standing points, it is proposed to use a remote target or measure directional angles (magnetic azimuths) of reference directions. Methods for obtaining the coordinates and displacement vectors of deformation marks in the same coordinate system are considered, depending on the implementation of the polar spatial intersection. An example of implementing the proposed observation methodology on the example of the Hydrocorpus-1 building located at 29 Polytechnicheskaya st., St. Petersburg, Russia is presented. The results obtained indicate the correctness of the proposed methodology.
References: 
1.   Alekhin V. N., Pletnev M. V., Antipin A. A. Monitoring deformatsii v real'nom vremeni s pomoshch'yu avtomatizirovannykh programmno-apparatnykh sistem. Geoprofi, 2013, no. 6, pp. 20–23.
2.   Verkhoturov V. I., Lashutin A. P., Petrov V. V., Sharapov A. M. Kontrol' sokhrannosti polozheniya elementov sputnikovykh antennykh sistem v period ikh nazemnoi ekspluatatsii. Materialy 28-i antennoi konf. Evropeiskogo kosmicheskogo agentstva, Nordvik: ESA, 2005, pp. 1–8.
3.   Gavrilov S. G., Sharov K. V., Anan'ev A. G. Sistema distantsionnogo monitoringa deformatsionnykh protsessov dvortsa sporta «Megasport». Geoprofi, 2015, no. 2, pp. 49–53.
4.   Kazantsev A. I. Metodika geodezicheskogo kontrolya deformatsii sooruzhenii v usloviyakh uplotnennoi gorodskoi zastroiki. Gornyi informatsionno-analiticheskii byulleten', 2015, Vol. 1, no. 12, pp. 108–117.
5.   Lupovka V. A., Bragin A. A. Opredelenie astronomicheskogo azimuta s pomoshch'yu elektronnykh takheometrov. Izv. vuzov «Geodeziya i aerofotos"emka», 2010, no. 5, pp. 25–31.
6.   Nguen Khyu V'et Razrabotka metodiki otsenki vertikal'nykh smeshchenii osnovanii zdanii i sooruzhenii na osnove analiza elementov modeli deformatsionnoi seti: Dis. na soisk. uch. step. kand. tekhn. nauk: 25.00.32. SPb.: Gornyi universitet, 2018, 164 p.
7.   Reznik B. E. Metodika kontrolya VEU pri nepreryvnom monitoringe. Geoprofi, 2016, no. 6, pp. 40–47.
8.   Sal'nikov V. G., Skripnikov V. A., Skripnikova M. A., Khlebnikova T. A. Primenenie sovremennykh avtomatizirovannykh geodezicheskikh priborov dlya monitoringa gidrotekhnicheskikh sooruzhenii GES. Vestnik SGUGiT, 2018, no. 3, pp. 108–124.
9.   Seredovich V. A., Seredovich A. V., Ivanov A. V., Sholomitskii A. A., Lagutina E. K. Kombinirovannyi metod opredeleniya deformatsii Bugrinskogo mosta pri ego ispytaniyakh. Vestnik SGUGiT, 2018, no. 4, pp. 85–99.
10.   Stepanova O. S., Stelling W. Organizatsiya geodezicheskikh nablyudenii za deformatsiyami pamyatnikov kul'turnogo naslediya (na primere Westpark g. Bokhum). Sb. materialov nauch. seminara stipendiatov programm «Mikhail Lomonosov III» i «Immanuil Kant III» 2013/2014 g, Moskva: FLINTA, 2014, pp. 75–78.
11.   Tsareva O. S., Dmitriev I. I. Novaya metodika nablyudenii za deformatsiyami pamyatnikov kul'turnogo naslediya. Politekhnicheskaya nedelya v Sankt-Peterburge: Materialy nauch. foruma s mezhdunar. uchastiem. SPb.: Izd-vo Politekhn. un-ta, 2016, pp. 151–154.
12.   Yambaev Kh. K. Nekotorye aspekty tsifrovoi tekhnologii geodezicheskogo monitoringa i diagnostiki nesushchikh konstruktsii unikal'nykh inzhenernykh sooruzhenii. Vestnik SGUGiT, 2018, Vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 138–153.
13.   Bryn M. J., Afonin D. A., Bogomolova N. N. (2017) Geodetic Monitoring of Deformation of Building Surrounding an Underground Construction. Procedia Engineering, no. 189, pp. 386-392. DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.05.061.
14.   Roy D. S., Gouvin P. (2007) Applications and limitations of automated motorized total stations. 7th International Symposium on Field Measurements in Geomechanics (FMGM 2007). - Boston: MA, USA, 24-27 September 2007. 103 p. DOI: 10.1061/40940(307)103.
Citation:
Kornilov Yu.N., 
Tsareva O.S., 
(2020) Perfecting the methods of monitoring the buildings and structures deformation. Geodesy and cartography = Geodezia i Kartografia, 81(4), pp. 9-18. (In Russian). DOI: 10.22389/0016-7126-2020-958-4-9-18
Publication History
Received: 30.09.2019
Accepted: 10.12.2019
Published: 20.05.2020

Content

2020 April DOI:
10.22389/0016-7126-2020-958-4