Developing a valuation method for digital objects of cartographic heritage

Cartography
UDC: 
528.91
DOI: 
10.22389/0016-7126-2020-960-6-29-34
1 Petrov S.T.
Year: 
2020
№: 
6
960
Pages: 
29-34

Moscow State University of Geodesy and Cartography (MIIGAiK)

1, 
Abstract:
The paper deals with the method of value assessment for objects of digital cartographic heritage. The method is based on the system of the original cartographic object transformation into various analog or digital forms and formats. The formula linking the assessment of digital cartographic objects with the evaluation of the original one, as well as its analog copies, is presented. The method involves а variety of evaluation criteria: historical, cultural, political, economic, etc. It covers all the stages of the objects’cycle from the development to their removal from circulation. The method includes structural elements of valuing, valuing scheme, the procedure of determining the objects’ significance levels. The author offers some examples of evaluations in the framework of UNESCO programs for preserving documentary and digital heritage. The valuation algorithm is based on the method of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP), which enables comparative valuing heterogeneous objects of analog and digital cartographic heritage.
References: 
1.   Zinchuk L. N., Korzunina G. E. Kartograficheskie kollektsii i elektronnaya biblioteka RGB. Rumyantsevskie chteniya, Moskva: Pashkov dom, 2005, pp. 85–87.
2.   Nauchnoe opisanie muzeinykh predmetov osnovnogo veshchevogo fonda po istorii nauki i tekhniki: Metodicheskie rekomendatsii. Izd. 3-e ispr. i dop. Moskva: Politekhnicheskii muzei, 2012, 25 p. URL: https://search.rsl.ru/ru/record/01000655131 (accessed: 10.10.2019).
3.   Pamyat' mira. Pamyat' Rossii: Sb. normat. i metod. materialov. Sostavitel' L. M. Eremina. Moskva: Pashkov dom, 1999, 145 p. URL: https://search.rsl.ru/ru/record/01000630660 (accessed: 10.10.2019).
4.   Rossiiskie pravila katalogizatsii. N. N. Kasparova (ruk.). – 2-e izd., ispr. Moskva: Pashkov dom, 2008, 660 p.
5.   Saati T. L. Prinyatie reshenii pri zavisimostyakh i obratnykh svyazyakh: analiticheskie seti. Moskva: LIBROKOM, 2009, 367 p.
6.   Savinykh V. P., Polyantseva I. B., Ilyushina T. V., Altynov A. E., Karachevtseva I. P., Kozlova N. A., Kolenkina M. M. Nauchnye podkhody i sovremennye tekhnologii dlya sokhraneniya istoricheskogo naslediya v issledovaniyakh kosmicheskogo prostranstva. Izv. vuzov Geodeziya i aerofotos"emka, 2019, Vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 5-12.
7.   Khartiya o sokhranenii tsifrovogo naslediya. Sait YuNESKO. URL: https://www.un.org/ru/documents/decl_conv/conventions/digital_heritage_charter.shtml (accessed: 10.10.2019).
8.   Shestakov V. A. ESSENTIA. Kniga 1. Atributsiya. SPb.: ANO «NII SMD», 2012, 540 p.
9.   Litvinenko M. V., Petrov S. T. (2018) Methodology for assessing the importance of landbound plans as objects of digital heritage, International Conference Research transfer, 2. Beijing, PRC. pp. 130-134.
Citation:
Petrov S.T., 
(2020) Developing a valuation method for digital objects of cartographic heritage. Geodesy and cartography = Geodezia i Kartografia, 81(6), pp. 29-34. (In Russian). DOI: 10.22389/0016-7126-2020-960-6-29-34
Publication History
Received: 15.10.2019
Accepted: 30.01.2020
Published: 20.07.2020

Content

2020 June DOI:
10.22389/0016-7126-2020-960-6