UDC: 
DOI: 
10.22389/0016-7126-2021-968-2-29-37
1 Anikeeva I.A.
Year: 
№: 
968
Pages: 
29-37

Roscartography, JSC

1, 
Abstract:
The task of assessing the quality of aerial imagery, obtained for mapping, in terms of vision properties, is very ambiguous due to the lack of objective criteria and evaluation methods. A system of indicators for aerial images quality and methods of their numerical assessment is presented. The fine aerial image’s quality is characterized by a set of its structural and gradation properties. The structural properties of the image are determined by the actual spatial resolution and photographic sharpness. Gradation properties of an image are characterized by the correct color rendering, the level of random noise and information completeness indicators – haze, radiometric resolution and the percentage of information loss in illumination and shadows.Methods of evaluating these indicators are formulated, and their recommended and acceptable numerical values are determined analytically. To clarify and correct the obtained analytical recommended and acceptable numerical values of the image quality indicators of their practical application possibility and further experimental studies are necessary with materials, obtained through various airborne imaging sensors for mapping.
References: 
1.   Anikeeva I.A. (2020) Sharpness indicator of aerial- and space images obtained for mapping purposes. Geodezia i Kartografia, 81(6), pp. 35-44. (In Russian). DOI: 10.22389/0016-7126-2020-960-6-35-44.
2.   Anikeeva I.A. (2020) Radiometric resolution and dynamic range of aerial and space images, obtained for monitoring and mapping purposes. Geodezia i Kartografia, 81(10), pp. 40-48. (In Russian). DOI: 10.22389/0016-7126-2020-964-10-40-48.
3.   Zotov P. V. Tsifrovoi shum izobrazheniya i ego prikladnoe znachenie v kriminalistike. Vestnik Saratovskoi gosudarstvennoi yuridicheskoi akademii, 2015, no. 6, pp. 175–179.
4.   Fotokinotechnika: Enciklopedija. Glavnyj redactor E. A. Iofis. Moscow: Sovetskaja enciklopedija, 1981, 447 p.
5.   Kadnichanskiy S.A. (2018) Сontrast evaluation of digital aerial and satellite images. Geodezia i Kartografia, 79(3), pp. 46-51. (In Russian). DOI: 10.22389/0016-7126-2018-933-3-46-51.
6.   Kuchko A.S. Aerofotografiya. Osnovy i metrologiya [Aerial Photography. Fundamentals and Metrology]. M.: Nedra, 1974, 272 p.
7.   Lapshenkov E. M. Realizatsiya metodov otsenki urovnya shuma izobrazheniya v srede MATLAB. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta priborostroeniya i informatiki. Ser.: Priborostroenie i informatsionnye tekhnologii, 2013, no. 44, pp. 96–106.
8.   Lapshenkov E. M. Neetalonnaya otsenka urovnya shuma tsifrovogo izobrazheniya na osnove garmonicheskogo analiza. Komp'yuternaya optika, 2012, Vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 439–447.
9.   Ot snimka k tsifrovoi real'nosti: distantsionnoe zondirovanie Zemli i fotogrammetriya. URL: http://conf.racurs.ru/upload/Presentations_2019/Signal-to-noise%20ratio%20estimation%20of%20aerial%20and%20satellite%20imagery.pdf
10.   Sai S. V., Sorokin N. Yu. Metod otsenki chetkosti fotorealistichnykh izobrazhenii. Elektronika, izmeritel'naya tekhnika, radiotekhnika i svyaz'. Dokl. TUSURa, 2012, Vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 78–82.
11.   Ancuti C. O., Ancuti C., De Vleeschouwer C., Sbert M. Color channel compensation (3C): A fundamental pre-processing step for image enhancement. IEEE Transactions On Image Processing, Volume 2020, no. 29, pp. 2653-2665.
12.   Biancoa G., Muzzupappa M., Brunoa F., Garciab R., Neumann L. (2015) A new color correction method for underwater imaging. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. no. XL-5/W5, pp. 25-32. DOI: 10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-5-W5-25-2015.
13.   Blanc Ph., Wald L. (2009) A review of earth-viewing methods for in-flight assessment of modulation transfer function and noise of optical spaceborne sensors, ffhal-00745076. URL: https://hal-mines-paristech.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00745076/document
14.   Chen M. J., Bovik A. C. (2014) No-reference image blur assessment using multiscale gradient. EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing, no. 1, pp. 1-11. DOI: 10.1186/1687-5281-2014-40.
15.   Cohen E., Yitzhaky Y. (2010) No-reference assessment of blur and noise impacts on image quality. Signal, Image and Video Processing, no. 4, pp. 289-302. DOI: 10.1007/s11760-009-0117-4.
16.   Gvozden G., Grgic S., Grgic M. (2018) Blind image sharpness assessment based on local contrast map statistics. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation, no. 50, pp. 145-148.
17.   Hussain M.A., Sheikh-Akbari A. (2018) Color Constancy Adjustment Using Sub-Blocks of the Image. IEEE Access, no. 6, pp. 46617-46629.
18.   Kim J. I., Kim T. (2011) Development of a Natural Target-based Edge Analysis Method for NIIRS Estimation. Korean Journal of Remote Sensing, Volume 27, no. 5, pp. 587-599.
19.   Sieberth T. (2020) Optical blur disturbs - The influence of optical-blurred images in photogrammetry. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XXIV ISPRS Congress, no. XLIII-B1-2020, pp. 383-388.
20.   Takahashi Y., Kuhara C., Chikatsu H. (2020) Image blur detection method based on gradient information in directional statistics. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XXIV ISPRS Congress, no. XLIII-B2-2020, pp. 91-95. DOI: 10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2020-91-2020.
Citation:
Anikeeva I.A., 
(2021) Method of numerical estimating aerial images indicators quality for mapping purposes. Geodesy and cartography = Geodezia i Kartografia, 82(2), pp. 29-37. (In Russian). DOI: 10.22389/0016-7126-2021-968-2-29-37
Publication History
Received: 24.11.2020
Accepted: 29.01.2021
Published: 20.03.2021

Content

2021 February DOI:
10.22389/0016-7126-2021-968-2

QR-code page

QR-код страницы