UDC: 
DOI: 
10.22389/0016-7126-2021-968-2-38-48
1 Ilyushina T.V.
2 Nazarov L.S.
Year: 
№: 
968
Pages: 
38-48

Moscow State University of Geodesy and Cartography (MIIGAiK)

1, 
Abstract:
The article deals with studying the historic design development of the eckers as landseparating tools, depending on the theoretical and practical matters of peasant land tenure, surveying forest areas, and those adjacent to the waters. The authors show that dividing lands of different practical use and establishing their boundaries is an important and necessary part of the land Fund state accounting, and its success depends on the qualified geodetic support possibilities. It is considered that the need to divide the land space can be traced in the laws of the knowledge development, performing geodetic works and improving the instruments’ design. As a result of the study, it was revealed that eckers make the only group of “earth-separating” tools; they are currently conventionally referred to as angle-measuring ones. Their main function is to divide space at fixed angles. The absence of a scale makes us think about their “non-measuring” purpose. The authors show that the features of the first “earth-separating” technical devices are basic for more complex designs of geodetic instruments, enabling to conduct diverse geodetic surveys in a certain historical era, depending on the application purpose and the tools using method.
References: 
1.   Antonovich A. Ya. Cherespolosnoe vladenie, ego proiskhozhdenie i khozyaistvennoe znachenie. Sel’skoe Khozyaistvo i Lesovodstvo, 1877, CXXVII. pp. 301–319.
2.   Bar F. F. Korennoe preobrazovanie krest'yanskogo khozyaistva i obshchinnogo zemlevladeniya. Prichiny kul'turnoi otstalosti i maloproizvoditel'nosti zemli i truda…. Sankt-Peterburg: Tip. V. Bezobrazov i Ko, 1909, pp. 118.
3.   Boguslavskii N. A. Kurs geodezii. P. 1. Sankt-Peterburg: In-t inzh. putei soobshch. imperatora Aleksandra I, 1914, 544 p.
4.   Boguslavskii N. A. Kurs geodezii i prilozhenie ee k izyskaniyam putei soobshcheniya: Posobie dlya studentov, uchenikov tekhnicheskikh uchebnykh zavedenii, tekhnikov putei soobshchenii i zemlemerov. P. 1. Sankt-Peterburg: In-t inzh. putei soobshch. imperatora Aleksandra I, 1908, 594 p.
5.   Bodnarskii M. S. Ocherki po istorii russkogo zemlevedeniya. Moskva: Izd-vo AN SSSR, 1947, 291 p.
6.   Bol'shaya sovetskaya entsiklopediya. URL: https://gufo.me/dict/bse/%D0%AD%D0%BA%D0%B5%D1%80 (accessed: 02.09.2020).
7.   Vitkovskii V. V. Topografiya. Sankt-Peterburg: Tip. Yu. N. Erlikh, 1904, pp. 591.
8.   Vitkovskii V. V. Prakticheskaya geodeziya. Sankt-Peterburg: Tip. Yu. N. Erlikh, 1911, pp. 865.
9.   German I. E. Istoriya russkogo mezhevaniya. – Izd. 3-e. Moskva: Tip. V. Rikhter", 1914, 291 p.
10.   Ivanov P. I. Opyt istoricheskogo issledovaniya o mezhevanii zemel' v Rossii. Moskva: Tip. S. Selivanskogo, 1846, 148 p.
11.   Ilyushina T. V., Nazarov L. S. Gosudarstvennoe znachenie mezhevaniya i lineino-izmeritel'nykh mezhevykh mer v istorii razvitiya Rossii. Izvestiya vuzov. Geodeziya i aerofotos"emka, 2017, no. 3, pp. 6–13.
12.   Kofod A. A. Krest'yanskie khutora na nadel'noi zemle. Kn. 1. Sankt-Peterburg: Tip. F. Vaisberga i P. Gershunina, 1905, pp. 283.
13.   Kofod A. A. Bor'ba s cherespolositseyu v Rossii i za granitseyu. Sankt-Peterburg: Tip. A. S. Suvorina, 1907, pp. 135.
14.   Kofod A. A. Russkoe zemleustroistvo. – Izd. 2-e. Sankt-Peterburg: Sel'skii vestnik, 1914, pp. 172.
15.   Malinovskii F. L. Istoricheskii vzglyad na mezhevanie v Rossii do 1765 g. Sankt-Peterburg: Tip. A. Sycheva, 1844, pp. 175.
16.   Milov L. V. Istoriya Rossii XVIII–XIX vekov. Moskva: Eksmo, 2006, 784 p.
17.   Nazarov L. S., Ilyushina T. V. Veshchestvennye i pechatnye istochniki v izuchenii istorii razvitiya geodezicheskikh priborov. Red.-sost. E. V. Minina; Redkol.: Yu. M. Baturin, S. S. Ilizarov, I. N. Yurkin.Istoriya nauki: istochniki, pamyatniki, nasledie: tret'i chteniya po istoriografii i istochnikovedeniyu istorii nauki i tekhniki: Materialy Mezhdunar. konf, Moskva: Yanus-K, 2019, 512 p.
18.   Solov'ev S. M. Kurs nizshei geodezii. – Izd. 3-e. Moskva: Tipografiya Yu. Vener", 1914, 1396 p.
19.   Teterin G. N. Istoriya geodezii v Rossii (do 1917 g.). Novosibirsk: SGGA, 1994, 91 p.
20.   Khrenov L. S. Khronologiya otechestvennoi geodezii s drevneishikh vremen i do nashikh dnei. Leningrad: Izd-vo AN SSSR, 1987, 291 p.
21.   Tsitsianov D. P. Kratkoe matematicheskoe iz"yasnenie zemlemeriya mezhevogo 1757 g. Sankt-Peterburg: Tip. Akad. Nauk, 1757, pp. 112.
22.   Boccaleri E. (1999) L’uso della groma in eta romana. Esperienze Progetti 125, anno XXVI, 1, gennaio-febbraio. pp. 26-29. URL: legioneromana.altervista.org/it/node/52?language=en (accessed: 02.09.2020).
23.   Lausedat A. (1898) Recherches sur les instruments, les methoodes et le dessin topographiques, 1, Paris, Gauthier-Villars, Imprimeur-Libraire. 450 p. URL: rchive.org/details/b2487789x_0001 (accessed: 02.09.2020).
24.   Optical Square Double. Prism laser sonics. URL: www.lasersonics.com.au/index.php?p=1_245 (accessed: 02.09.2020).
Citation:
Ilyushina T.V., 
Nazarov L.S., 
(2021) Necessity and regularity of geodetic knowledge development. Eckers as “earth-dividing” tools. Geodesy and cartography = Geodezia i Kartografia, 82(2), pp. 38-48. (In Russian). DOI: 10.22389/0016-7126-2021-968-2-38-48
Publication History
Received: 20.11.2019
Accepted: 07.09.2020
Published: 20.03.2021

Content

2021 February DOI:
10.22389/0016-7126-2021-968-2