Methods of assessing cartographic production

Cartography

UDC:

528.9

DOI:

10.22389/0016-7126-2023-998-8-29-38

1 Orlov M.Yu.

2 Vereschaka T.V.

Year:

2023

№:

998

Pages:

29-38

Roskadastr, PLC

1,

Moscow State University of Geodesy and Cartography (MIIGAiK)

2,

Abstract:

The article deals with creating a methodology for assessing cartographic production; the study showed that political, economic, scientific and technical factors make the main influence over its development. The relevance of the research is due to modern requirements for an objective display of production development, the progress and regression of which is evidenced by the change in quantitative indicators over time. The methodology is based on the analysis of the identified quantitative indicators, such as releasing cartographic products (for the entire history of development) and their abrupt changes, defined by the author as its indicators, which enable determining the degree of the factors influence. A weighted point assessment of the impact of the political, economic, scientific and technical determinant on cartographic production in the period under review was obtained; that made it possible to construct and visualize an integrated graphic model in the period from 1705 to the present. To compare the results, an expert approach to evaluation of production is proposed; it is expressed by experts in the rational arrangement of the problem analysis with the quantitative assessment of judgments and processing of their results. An assessment of cartographic production in Russia is carried out based on the developed methodology at all stages of historical development

Keywords:

assessment methodology, cartographic production, database, development strategy, factors of influence, indicators, spatial data

The article was prepared as part of the research work Geomap-2030 (registration number 121080600083-9)

References:

1. Brovko E. A. Sozdanie sistemy gosudarstvennogo topograficheskogo monitoringa v edinom geoinformatsionnom prostranstve strany. Informatsiya i kosmos, 2021, no. 1, pp. 138–145.

2. Vasyutinskaya S. I., Fel'dman I. A. Kolichestvennye otsenki v SWOT analize. Vestnik Moskovskogo gos. obl. un-ta. Seriya: Ekonomika, 2010, no. 1, pp. 59–66.

3. Vereschaka T.V., Orlov M.Yu. (2022) Trends and prospects of cartographic production development in Russia and abroad. Geodezia i Kartografia, 83(8), pp. 2-13. (In Russian). DOI: 10.22389/0016-7126-2022-986-8-2-13.

4. Glushkov V. V. Istoriya voennoi kartografii v Rossii (XVIII – nachalo XX v.). Moskva: IDEL, 2007, 528 p.

5. Karpik A. P., Lisitskii D. V. Perspektivy razvitiya geodezicheskogo i kartograficheskogo proizvodstva i novaya paradigma geoprostranstvennoi deyatel'nosti. Vestnik SSUGT, 2020, Vol. 2, pp. 19–29. DOI: 10.33764/2411-1759-2020-25-2-19-29.

6. Krylov V. E. Kolichestvennaya otsenka vliyaniya faktorov vneshnei sredy na organizatsiyu. Innovatsionnaya ekonomika: perspektivy razvitiya i sovershenstvovaniya, 2019, no. 2 (36), pp. 246–252.

7. Kutuzov V. A., Evlanov L. G. Ekspertnye otsenki v upravlenii. Moskva: Ekonomika, 1978, 133 p.

8. Orlov A. I. Organizatsionno-ekonomicheskoe modelirovanie: Uchebnik v 3 ch. – Ch. 2. Ekspertnye otsenki. Moskva: Izd-vo MGTU im. N.E. Baumana, 2011, 486 p.

9. Belcher B., Davel R., Claus R. (2020) A refined method for theory-based evaluation of the societal impacts of research. Methods X, no. 7, pp. 100788. DOI: 10.1016/j.mex.2020.100788.

10. Robinson A. C., Demšar U., Moore A. B., Buckley A., Jiang B., Field K., Kraak M.-J., Camboim S. P., Sluter C. R. (2017) Geospatial big data and cartography: research challenges and opportunities for making maps that matter. International Journal of Cartography, no. 3 (sup1), pp. 32–60. DOI: 10.1080/23729333.2016.1278151.

Citation:

Orlov M.Yu.,

Vereschaka T.V.,

(2023) Methods of assessing cartographic production. Geodesy and cartography = Geodezia i Kartografia, 84(8), pp. 29-38. (In Russian). DOI: 10.22389/0016-7126-2023-998-8-29-38