DOI: 
10.22389/0016-7126-2024-1003-1-33-42
1 Polyakova Y.R.
2 Merkushev S.A.
Year: 
№: 
1003
Pages: 
33-42

Perm State National Research University

1, 
2, 
Abstract:
The approaches to studying the attractiveness of pedestrian spaces are proposed, which could in the researchers’ opinion serve as one of the urban environment quality indicators. Based on the authors` methodology with the help of geographic information technologies, an assessment of the attractiveness of Perm’s large center pedestrian spaces’ most consolidated components was carried out. To form an array of the data (attractor objects), open sources were used. Attribute values which enabled analyzing the direct location of attractors were the proximity and belonging to the components of the pedestrian spaces chosen as the subject of the study. As a result of the vector data spatial analysis, noticeable differences in the attractiveness of those places were revealed. Its highest index is typical for the embankment of the Kama. The result is slightly lower near the esplanade and foot zones near the railway station Perm-2. The lowest level was found in the mentioned spaces located near the southern and eastern outskirts of the large center. The authors analyze the features and problems of using publicly available data, propose measures to increase the attractiveness of the central pedestrian spaces of Perm, and conclude that it is necessary to form a unified space to gather and swap information in order to increase the effectiveness of further local studies of the environmental quality
References: 
1.   Artemova O. V., Logacheva N. M. Razvitie rossiiskikh megapolisov s orientatsiei na cheloveka: vozmozhnosti i ogranicheniya. Vestnik Permskogo un-ta. Ser.: Ekonomika, 2021, Vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 183–201. DOI: 10.17072/1994-9960-2021-2-183-201.
2.   Vagner E. A. Kompleksnyi potentsial i otsenka effektivnosti funktsionirovaniya arkhitekturnoi sredy obshchestvennykh peshekhodnykh prostranstv v kontekste slozhivsheisya gorodskoi zastroiki. Urbanistika, 2017, no. 1, pp. 35–50. DOI: 10.7256/2310-8673.2017.1.22465.
3.   Zazulya V. S. Problematika i tendentsii razvitiya obshchestvennykh prostranstv: otechestvennyi i zarubezhnyi opyt. Urbanistika, 2021, no. 1, pp. 56–72. DOI: 10.7256/2310-8673.2021.1.34516.
4.   Kadyrov T. E. Formirovanie obshchestvennykh prostranstv v istoricheskikh tsentrakh gorodov na primere g. Kazani. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gos. arkhitekt.-stroit. un-ta. Ser.: Stroitel'stvo i arkhitektura, 2019, no. 3 (76), pp. 196–207.
5.   Korosteleva L. Yu., Voropaeva A. V. Kul'turnaya infrastruktura i kachestvo gorodskoi sredy malykh gorodov Podmoskov'ya. Rossiya reformiruyushchayasya, 2022, no. 20, pp. 501–524. DOI: 10.19181/ezheg.2022.19.
6.   Merkushev S. A. Naberezhnye krupneishikh gorodov Urala i Povolzh'ya i ikh vozmozhnosti v povyshenii attraktivnosti gorodskoi sredy. Geograficheskii vestnik, 2019, no. 1 (48), pp. 41–55.
7.   Merkushev S. A. Tsentr i vneshnyaya zona rossiiskikh gorodov-millionerov: podkhody k otsenke attraktivnosti. Pod red. N. M. Mikheevoi, N. V. Kaledina.Regional'naya politika, politicheskaya geografiya i geopolitika: istoriya i sovremennost': Materialy mezhdunar. nauch. konf., posvyashchennoi 20-letiyu kafedry regional'noi politiki i politicheskoi geografii SPbGU, SPb.: Izd-vo VVM, 2022, pp. 355–364.
8.   Mikhailov A. A. Prostranstvennaya organizatsiya sektora uslug v aglomeratsiyakh Moskvy, Parizha, Berlina i Londona: sb. st. Geourbanistika i gradostroitel'stvo: teoreticheskie i prikladnye issledovaniya. Moskva: MGU, 2021, pp. 155–175.
9.   Notman O. V. Indeksnyi metod otsenki kachestva gorodskoi sredy: mezhdunarodnyi i rossiiskii opyt. Vestnik Adygeiskogo gos. un-ta. Ser. 1. Regionovedenie: filosofiya, istoriya, sotsiologiya, yurisprudentsiya, politologiya, kul'turologiya, 2021, no. 2 (279), pp. 89–99. DOI: 10.53598/2410-3691-2021-2-279-89-99.
10.   Preobrazhenskii Yu. V. Sozdanie sotsiokul'turnykh tsennostei: problema lokalizatsii v gorodskom prostranstve. Vestnik Tverskogo gos. un-ta. Ser.: Geografiya i geoekologiya, 2020, no. 4 (32), pp. 60–68. DOI: 10.26456/2226-7719-2020-4-60-68.
11.   Sukhikh Yu. V., Tumanik G. N. Problematika vklyucheniya podzemnykh prostranstv v peshekhodnyi karkas gorodskogo tsentra. Tvorchestvo i sovremennost', 2018, no. 3 (7), pp. 33–38.
12.   Tsarikov A. A. Peshekhodnoe dvizhenie i perspektivy razvitiya ulichno-dorozhnoi seti tsentra Ekaterinburga. Sovremennye problemy transportnogo kompleksa Rossii, 2015, no. 1 (6), pp. 4–7.
Citation:
Polyakova Y.R., 
Merkushev S.A., 
(2024) Evaluation of Perm’s large center pedestrian zones segments attractiveness using geographic information technologies. Geodesy and cartography = Geodezia i Kartografia, 85(1), pp. 33-42. (In Russian). DOI: 10.22389/0016-7126-2024-1003-1-33-42
Publication History
Received: 20.03.2023
Accepted: 27.12.2023
Published: 25.02.2024

Content

2024 January DOI:
10.22389/0016-7126-2024-1003-1