DOI: 
10.22389/0016-7126-2025-1025-11-52-56
1 Kravchenko T.V.
2 Bogdanova O.V.
Year: 
№: 
1025
Pages: 
52-56

Industrial University of Tyumen

1, 
2, 
Abstract:
Archaeological heritage sites are non-standard real estate objects bearing unique information on the regional features of civilizational development. Undoubtedly, their preservation for future generations is the key to forming their national self-awareness and identity, but integrating these sites and related territories into economic activity is no less important. Employment of archaeological heritage sites within the region`s field of investment activity can be considered one of the elements of sustainable development of the entity. The method for assessing the area with archaeological sites proposed by the authors in this article enabled the identification of six municipal districts in the south of the Tyumen oblast, RF with the highest historical and cultural potential. The proposed assessment will facilitate the development of a database of archaeological heritage sites, which can be incorporated into the National Spatial Data System, complement their information field and expand the range of opportunities for their safe use and integration into the investment sector of the region
References: 
1.   Afonasova A. I. Opredelenie rekreatsionnoi tsennosti Mariinsko-Tyazhinskogo rekreatsionnogo raiona. Regional'naya ekonomika: teoriya i praktika, 2010, no. 7, pp. 61–66.
2.   Bogomyakov I. V. Pravovoi rezhim zemel'nykh uchastkov, zanyatykh nedvizhimymi ob"ektami arkheologicheskogo naslediya: problemy primeneniya zakonodatel'stva i puti ikh resheniya. Kul'tura: upravlenie, ekonomika, pravo, 2010, no. 1, pp. 23–25.
3.   Veklenko V. I., Algafri M. A., Mokhammad M. A. Teoreticheskie osnovy upravleniya sotsial'no-ekonomicheskim razvitiem territorii s ob"ektami kul'turnogo naslediya. Kreativnaya ekonomika, 2019, Vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 1215–1234. DOI: 10.18334/ce.13.6.40779.
4.   Klimenko A. I., Fedorov A. N. Ingal'skaya dolina kak arkheologicheskii pamyatnik. Voprosy istorii, 2021, no. 1, pp. 190–197. DOI: 10.31166/VoprosyIstorii202101Statyi07.
5.   Kravchenko T. V., Bogdanova O. V. Osnovnye metody upravleniya territoriyami s ob"ektami arkheologicheskogo naslediya: Problemy i Perspektivy. Sovremennye problemy zemel'no-imushchestvennykh otnoshenii, urbanizatsii territorii i formirovaniya komfortnoi gorodskoi sredy: Sb. dokladov konferentsii, Tyumen': Tyumenskii industrial'nyi universitet, 2024, pp. 115–122.
6.   Okmyanskaya V. M. Analiz funktsionirovaniya i razvitiya osobo okhranyaemykh prirodnykh territorii Tyumenskoi oblasti. Mezhdunarodnyi agrokul'turnyi zhurnal, 2022, no. 4, pp. 144–149.
7.   Putrik Yu. S. Rol' ob"ektov kul'turnogo naslediya i turizma kak faktorov kul'turnogo suvereniteta. Zhurnal Instituta naslediya, 2024, no. 4 (39), pp. 4–7.
8.   Sizov A.P. (2018) Assessment of the environment-forming potential of the territory of populated areas in the implementation of state monitoring of lands. Geodezia i Kartografia, 79(6), pp. 43-50. (In Russian). DOI: 10.22389/0016-7126-2018-936-6-43-50.
9.   Khramtsov A. Kontseptsiya sozdaniya muzeya pod otkrytym nebom v Ingal'skoi doline. Proekt Baikal, 2022, no. 71, pp. 157–164. DOI: 10.51461/projectbaikal.71.1958.
10.   (2019) Perspectives on sustainability and tourism management at archaeological and heritage sites. Tan N. H. (Editor). SEAMEO SPAFA Regional Centre for Archaeology andFine Arts, Bangkok, 321 p.
Citation:
Kravchenko T.V., 
Bogdanova O.V., 
(2025) A modern approach to determining the potential historical and cultural value of territories with archaeological heritage sites. Geodesy and cartography = Geodeziya i Kartografiya, 86(11), pp. 52-56. (In Russian). DOI: 10.22389/0016-7126-2025-1025-11-52-56
Publication History
Received: 24.02.2025
Accepted: 27.10.2025
Published: 20.12.2025

Content