1 Anikeeva I.A.

Roscartography, JSC

The results of fine quality indicators assessment for images, obtained with various aerial surveying systems for mapping purposes are presented. The values of parameters that characterize technical conditions, technical parameters of airborne imaging and technologic settings for imagery postprocessing, natural conditions of aerial surveying are determined. The author presents a comparative analysis of fine quality indicators assessment both for photos, the quality of which was found to be satisfactory as production technical control results and those rejected due to some relevant indicators (haze, blurring, etc) and accepted unsuitable for creating cartographic products based on them. It is shown, that some quality indicators, such as spatial resolution, sharpness and the degree (standard deviation) of random noise, are advisable to be determined at performing factory calibration of aerial cameras and included in certificate as well as other calibration parameters as metrological characteristics of the obtained imagery. Acceptable values of fine quality indicators, obtained during joint analysis of previous theoretical researches results and experimental verification, based on images, obtained by various aerial surveying systems for mapping purposes were generalized and recommended during the research.
1.   Anikeeva I.A. (2021) Application of open image databases at airborne image quality assessing for mapping purposes. Geodezia i Kartografia, 82(5), pp. 51-60. (In Russian). DOI: 10.22389/0016-7126-2021-971-5-51-60.
2.   Kadnichanskiy S.A. (2018) Сontrast evaluation of digital aerial and satellite images. Geodezia i Kartografia, 79(3), pp. 46-51. (In Russian). DOI: 10.22389/0016-7126-2018-933-3-46-51.
3.   Kuchko A.S. Aerofotografiya. Osnovy i metrologiya [Aerial Photography. Fundamentals and Metrology]. M.: Nedra, 1974, 272 p.
4.   Lapshenkov E. M. Neetalonnaya otsenka urovnya shuma tsifrovogo izobrazheniya na osnove garmonicheskogo analiza. Komp'yuternaya optika, 2012, Vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 439–447.
5.   Lapshenkov E. M. Realizatsiya metodov otsenki urovnya shuma izobrazheniya v srede MATLAB. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta priborostroeniya i informatiki. Ser.: Priborostroenie i informatsionnye tekhnologii, 2013, no. 44, pp. 96–106.
6.   Rukovodstvo po aerofotos"emochnym rabotam. Moskva: Izdatel'stvo «Vozdushnyi transport», 1988, 334 p.
7.   Sevast'yanova M. N., Serebryakov S. A. Metodicheskoe posobie po kursu «Tekhnika i tekhnologiya aerokosmicheskoi s"emki». Moskva: Izd-vo MIIGAiK, 2015, 58 p.
8.   Laboratory for Image and Video Engineering. URL: https://www.live.ece.utexas.edu/research/quality/subjective.htm (accessed: 13.01.2020).
9.   Sheikh H.R., Sabir M.F. and Bovik A.C. (2006) A statistical evaluation of recent full reference image quality assessment algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, Volume 15, no. 11, pp. 3440-3451.
10.   Sheikh H. R., Wang Z., Cormack L., Bovik A. C. LIVE Image Quality Assessment Database Release 2. URL: live.ece.utexas.edu/research/quality (accessed: 13.01.2020).
11.   Wang Z., Bovik A.C., Sheikh H. R., Simoncelli E. P. (2004) Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, Volume 13, no. 4, pp. 600-612. DOI: 10.1109/TIP.2003.819861.
Anikeeva I.A., 
(2021) Assessment of recommended and acceptable image quality indicators’ values, based on materials, obtained with various aerial surveying systems for mapping purposes . Geodesy and cartography = Geodezia i Kartografia, 82(9), pp. 30-40. (In Russian). DOI: 10.22389/0016-7126-2021-975-9-30-40
Publication History
Received: 29.01.2021
Accepted: 21.05.2021
Published: 20.10.2021


2021 September DOI: