Development of a multi-functional spatial analysis tool for scenario-based urban environment quality assessment on the example of Novosibirsk

Geoinformatics
UDC: 
004.04:332.14:528.942
DOI: 
10.22389/0016-7126-2025-1016-2-26-37
1 Musikhin I.A.
2 Opritova O.A.
3 Taranenko S.V.
Year: 
2025
№: 
2
1016
Pages: 
26-37

Siberian State University of Geosystems and Technologies

1, 
2, 
3, 
Abstract:
Based on the study of world experience and regulatory framework in urban planning, a spatial analysis tool of scenario urban environment quality assessment and its dynamics change due to the implementation of the master plan or scenario modification was developed and then applied to the City of Novosibirsk. The possibilities of geoinformatics and GIS-technologies in developing an efficient multipurpose spatial analysis tool are shown. Sources of initial data, a set of urban environment quality indicators, an expert knowledge base, approaches to the formation of scenario patterns, mathematical apparatus for calculating the urban environment quality index and the dynamics of its change as well as methods for verifying simulation results, collecting and updating information are described. The scenario values of urban environment quality indices for municipal authorities and groups of residents were calculated. A number of map schemes representing scenario patterns were created and “soft spots” of the urban environment state were identified
The article was prepared while implementing the scientific grant of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation No. 075-15-2020-804
References: 
1.   Antonova I.S., Belalov T.A., Zhdanova A.B. Ustoichivoe razvitie kak kontseptsiya povysheniya kachestva gorodskoi sredy monogorodov. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Politicheskie, sotsiologicheskie i ekonomicheskie nauki, 2020, Vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 505–515. DOI: 10.21603/2500-3372-2020-5-4-505-515.
2.   Giricheva E. E., Bocharnikov V. N., Fomin K. V. Otsenka kachestva gorodskoi sredy Vladivostoka na osnove sistemy indikatorov. Regional'nye issledovaniya, 2022, no. 4, pp. 76–91. DOI: 10.5922/1994-5280-2022-4-7.
3.   Dzhurka N. G. Testirovanie al'ternativnykh modelei regional'nogo ekonomicheskogo rosta: grani vozmozhnogo (o knige A. G. Isaeva «Ekonomicheskii rost rossiiskikh regionov: ekzogennye i endogennye istochniki»). Prostranstvennaya ekonomika, 2022, no. 18 (1), pp. 168–183. DOI: 10.14530/se.2022.1.168-183.
4.   Il'ina I. N. Kachestvo gorodskoi sredy kak faktor ustoichivogo razvitiya munitsipal'nykh obrazovanii. Imushchestvennye otnosheniya v Rossiiskoi Federatsii, 2015, no. 5 (164), pp. 69–82.
5.   Lipilin D. A., Evtushenko D. D. Otsenka kachestva gorodskoi sredy s primeneniem geoinformatsionnykh sistem na primere Moskovskogo mikroraiona goroda Krasnodara. Regional'nye geosistemy, 2022, no. 46 (2), pp. 223–240. DOI: 10.52575/2712-7443-2022-46-2-223-240.
6.   Musikhin I.A., Opritova O.A., Taranenko S.V. (2023) Technology of scenario-based spatial analysis: planning regional economic development (on the example of Novosibirsk region). Geodezia i Kartografia, 84(11), pp. 18-30. (In Russian). DOI: 10.22389/0016-7126-2023-1001-11-18-30.
7.   Notman O. V. Indeksnyi metod otsenki kachestva gorodskoi sredy: mezhdunarodnyi i rossiiskii opyt. Vestnik Adygeiskogo gos. un-ta. Ser. 1. Regionovedenie: filosofiya, istoriya, sotsiologiya, yurisprudentsiya, politologiya, kul'turologiya, 2021, no. 2 (279), pp. 89–99. DOI: 10.53598/2410-3691-2021-2-279-89-99.
8.   Chernykh V. V., Ivanenko V. A. Analiz i napravleniya sovershenstvovaniya metodiki formirovaniya indeksa kachestva gorodskoi sredy. Ekonomicheskii vektor, 2021, no. 2 (25), pp. 128–137. DOI: 10.36807/2411-7269-2021-2-25-128-137.
9.   Engel'gardt A. E., Lipovka A. Yu., Fedchenko I. G. Mezhdunarodnyi opyt indeksirovaniya kachestva gorodskoi sredy. Urbanistika, 2018, no. 4, pp. 77–87. DOI: 10.7256/2310-8673.2018.4.27886.
10.   Hansson S., Arfvidsson H., Simon D. (2019) Governance for sustainable urban development: the double function of SDG indicators. Area Development and Policy, no. 4 (3), pp. 217–235. DOI: 10.1080/23792949.2019.1585192.
11.   Hsu A., Chakraborty T., Thomas R., Manya D., Weinfurter A., Chin N. J. W., Goyal N., Feierman A. (2020) Measuring What Matters, Where It Matters: A Spatially Explicit Urban Environment and Social Inclusion Index for the Sustainable Development Goals. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, no. 2: 62, DOI: 10.3389/frsc.2020.556484.
12.   Krishnan V. S., Firoz C. M. (2020) Regional urban environmental quality assessment and spatial analysis. Journal of Urban Management, no. 9 (2), pp. 191–204. DOI: 10.1016/j.jum.2020.03.001.
13.   Podoprigora Y., Danilova M., Ufimtseva E. (2019) Quality of Urban Environment as a Factor of Development of Municipal Formations. Proceedings of the International Science and Technology Conference "FarEast—on" (ISCFEC 2019), pp. 242–245. DOI: 10.2991/iscfec-19.2019.67.
14.   Roy S., Bose A., Majumder S., Roy Chowdhury I., Abdo H. G., Almohamad H., Al Dughairi A. A. (2022) Evaluating urban environment quality (UEQ) for Class-I Indian city: an integrated RS-GIS based exploratory spatial analysis. Geocarto International, no. 38 (1), DOI: 10.1080/10106049.2022.2153932.
15.   Methodology and Results of a Comparative Analysis of Cities. URL: golnk.ru/0gVan (accessed: 08.07.2024).
16.   Wolniak R., Jonek-Kowalska I. (2021) The level of the quality of life in the city and its monitoring. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, no. 34 (3), pp. 376–398. DOI: 10.1080/13511610.2020.1828049.
Citation:
Musikhin I.A., 
Opritova O.A., 
Taranenko S.V., 
(2025) Development of a multi-functional spatial analysis tool for scenario-based urban environment quality assessment on the example of Novosibirsk. Geodesy and cartography = Geodezia i Kartografia, 86(2), pp. 26-37. (In Russian). DOI: 10.22389/0016-7126-2025-1016-2-26-37
Publication History
Received: 28.08.2024
Accepted: 28.01.2025
Published: 20.03.2025

Content

2025 February DOI:
10.22389/0016-7126-2025-1016-2